This seems like the beginning of the end for bars as well.
Since bars are public, and you can't smoke in them, they may as well ban drinking in public, so do away with bars altogether.
2007-01-25 23:05:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
smoking is just the first step, soon it will be beer and eventually a word ban(Texas city trying this now) fight all bans with everything you can think of. help by filling the reporting hot-lines with fake reports ETC..
2007-01-25 23:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They already have those laws, in a sense. Obviously a bar and a restaurant are public places and you can drink there, but you cannot drink in a public place that is not designated as a drinking area, such as most parks. Public intoxication used to be a crime. Now it's Unconstitutional without more, but the police always just add the charge "disorderly conduct" and arrest you for "drunk and disorderly."
2007-01-25 23:28:26 · answer #2 · answered by David M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even though prevention is better than a cure, the millions of people that currently have cancer don't fall into the prevention category. They may die in 5, 10, or 15 years. Everyone on earth would have to be cured first before the research for curing stops.
2016-03-29 03:16:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All iit takes is a bunch of people putting pressure on the government to ban it.
2007-01-25 23:13:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it has been the case already during prohibition. it can always go back to the caves too.
2007-01-25 23:13:13 · answer #5 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't give the pleasure police any ideas.
2007-01-25 23:09:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋