A gypsy woman gave me an opportunity to travel back in time, but I'm not sure whether I should take it. If you would age the same amount of years as you would go back - would you do it? Or would you not consider reliving life to the full in the first place?
A gypsy told me she can transport me back to 1997 (10 years ago), but as I'm 28 year old now I'd be 38 in 1997 - which would bring me back to this question eventually at the age of 48.. Quite a drawback. But on the plus side I could meet my girlfriend a whole lot earlier, and she'd be lots younger than I am (legal though heheh)
2007-01-25 21:50:06 · 17 answers · asked by McAtterie 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Are you for real? Everyone knows that you have to accelerate to the speed of light and your mass increase exponentially before you can Even hope to travel back in time. How can a gypsy manage to do this without a trinitron particle accelerator and a mass phototron?
2007-01-25 21:57:09 · answer #1 · answered by BARROWMAN 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am a Gypsy (we are called Rromani, by the way)... really. Bonafide Gypsy.
I shall transport you back in time to whatever era you wish for a paltry $100. For an additional $100 I can make you whatever age you desire to be.
Do you believe me? You should because I am a Gypsy.
Truthfully, I hope you are joking. 1) you cannot be taken back in time, 2) Gypsies have no special powers, 3) 1997 really sucked.
I would not mind reliving bits of my life if I could retain my current knowledge, however, if I did relive my life I most likely would make the same stupid mistakes I did then.
2007-01-28 14:36:32 · answer #2 · answered by j 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hell NO!
If you went back in time and met your girlfriend sooner, it is possible that, by now, you'd be living the nightmare. You may have surrendered to living a life more ordinary, with kids, mortgage, and monotony. For all the bliss you may have shared, I'm sure she wouldn't have been ready to recognise your loveliness when she was only 22. Indeed, perhaps you wouldn't have recognised her.
Just buy some lucky heather off the tipsy gypsy, and enjoy what the future brings...xxx
2007-01-26 02:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
u seem a bit determined on this time travel thing, and no i wouldn't. plus it's the same difference, if u went back in time to meet ur gf u's be ten years older and therefore thats ten more years off u're life, so as u'll probably die bfore her, thats ten less years with her, either way u look at it
2007-01-25 21:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by pixoncoke 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
if you go back in time you would loss ten years and be 18 because going back means to reverse, that would include your age., but you would have lived twice
invest in
Microsoft
Cisco
intel
then in 2000 sell all your stock and you will be a millionaire.
I would go back/forward in time to be someone else.
2007-01-25 22:07:39 · answer #5 · answered by Wicked 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I remember doing the Time Warp!
Let's do the Time Warp again!
2007-01-25 21:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
have you stooped taking the tablets again.the Dr told you this would happen.
2007-01-26 09:37:07 · answer #7 · answered by NIGEL R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well is it worth 20 years? just to meet her younger, when you already know she's great? wouldn't it be nicer to spend these 20 years together?
2007-01-25 21:55:38 · answer #8 · answered by dianka(â?ªis a kidâ?ª)â?¢ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I would not travel back.
2007-01-28 06:51:20 · answer #9 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah - and have you asked yourself what is the catch? Don't be so gullable.
2007-01-25 21:56:13 · answer #10 · answered by stgoodric 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋