no, stick with barnes... you'll be better off in the long run...
2007-01-25 20:52:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on how deep you league is. I would make the move because I read a report today 1/26, that says Charlie V will play any game now. And he will definitely be a numer 1 option until Redd/Williams return.
However, it is a risk with Charlie, but the way I see it is Matt Barnes value is gone. Especially when Jason RIchardson returns.
2007-01-26 06:11:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frankie Three Time 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Matt Barnes performs a lot more effective powerful protection than Mike MIller, yet to me, Miller is the variety of guy who can unmarried-handely turn a sport round such as his threes. Hes a miles more effective powerful 3-aspect shooter than Barnes. So imma take Miller. BQ: Blake's passing potential is so a lot more effective powerful then Chalmers'. So gotta take Blake.
2016-10-17 03:27:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by leinen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Villanueva is having an injury-riddled year. Barnes is playing well this year. He'll give you three's and has had some double-digit rebound games this year. He'll give you solid numbers for a waiver. Plus, any stats is better than no stats.
2007-01-26 03:28:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kane K 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Villanueva played last night, so I would do it just based on speculation, because Barnes' fantasy value is done, now that GS has Jackson, Harrington, Pietrus, Richardson, etc . . . just not enough minutes to go around, and it's going to hurt all of them, but most of all Pietrus and Barnes
2007-01-26 22:14:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by citizen insane 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Charlie V is injured. Wait untill he comes back, see if he can string a couple good games together before getting him.
2007-01-26 04:34:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by frigon_p 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
keep barnes unless it is a keeper league... barnes will be better this year than the injury plagued villanueva
2007-01-25 23:51:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Beast8981 5
·
0⤊
0⤋