2007-01-25 19:01:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
no, he sounds dangerous. How about Superman?
2007-01-25 19:09:35 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Honestly, YES! I bet he would back off and let the general population work out their problems. He'd be too busy eating cheezypuffs and people would have to start taking care of themselves instead of waiting for the government to enact a law to do it for them.
2007-01-26 04:03:59 · answer #2 · answered by Larry R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without question ! he could nt do worse than Bush.
Shhet who would ever have though that any President could get a lower acceptance rating than Nixon, and the dude wasnt even trying....
2007-01-26 03:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're not talking about south park are you?
lol, if so, i'll keep my answer to myself until i feel the apocolypse is upon us.
2007-01-26 03:08:39 · answer #4 · answered by yiu 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-01-26 03:04:11 · answer #5 · answered by ginger 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, Bush would be blatantly saying Respect my authori-tay if he had a chance (or a clue). Snacky cakes for all!
2007-01-26 03:07:49 · answer #6 · answered by sticky 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Only if you can stay out of his country and let him have it all to himself dawg!!! And Stay out of his hallways!
2007-01-26 03:41:03 · answer #7 · answered by dwntwnbadboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Maybe Chef.
2007-01-26 08:01:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way, he would let the country go crazy. We would be a worse country with his as our president.
2007-01-26 03:06:11 · answer #9 · answered by KatieL 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It depends on who he's running against.
2007-01-26 03:06:05 · answer #10 · answered by Havana Brown 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋