As much as I cannot be a fan of a republican president... I'd say Guiliani. NYC? That's a country in itself! He has a better resume.
2007-01-25 18:09:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Obama is the only one of the four who looks good, and that may just be because We know less about him.
Giuliani is a definite no, and the politician who used to be McCain sold out to the Bush-league a couple of years ago.
Hillary's only qualification is a lack of a penis for those who want a woman president at any cost, her sound bytes come across just as hollow as Clueless George's.
Kerry is a soul mate to Bush (Skull and Bones cult), Gore is the male version of Hillary.
I fear the corruption in American politics has finally reached the state that there are no qualified people in a position to be nominated by the two biggest parties.
This nation was intended to NOT have political parties, but we caught the infection from England. We should all vote outside party lines, and start the slogan going "The Parties Over".
2007-01-25 18:36:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
To be honest with you none of the above Clinton and ABM are both to liberal,we need representatives that are concerned about all mankind,and not just few,our country need those that will think of the safety of all Americans,now for McCain and Giuliani, McCain speaks of the war in Iraq,what are his other and most important issues,we have millions suffering in this country without health insurance,and other needs.Giuliani well he saved New York,and married his housekeeper or his nanny,cheated on his wife.What else can I say, for people really don't know this man.
2007-01-25 18:37:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joyfulness 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of the above as the people you've named (and the frontrunners that the independent objective mainstream media has already chosen) are essentially puppets for the owners of the Federal Reserve (which is a privately owned corporation, that also control, by controlling the majority stock, the mainstream media, many corporations, academia and even Hollyweird).
None of the above has the spine to stand up against the people who are running America into the ground. This is demonstrated in their records. When have any of these people made even one attempt to abolish the private ownership of the Federal Reserve?
My choice in 2008: Congressman Ron Paul. Unlike the others you've named he has enough spine to consistently vote pro-Constitution (instead of only swearing to uphold and defend it like they all have) and to vote his conscience rather than play party politics or subside to the prevailing political winds.
The real question here is do you want a puppet or a real leader? I say it's well past time Americans raised the bar before the owners of the Federal Reserve accomplish their entire political agenda.
2007-01-25 21:23:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
At this time I think that I am going to vote for Rudy but I am not impressed with any of the Republicans. I will not vote democrat because none of the democrats stand for anything that I believe in. Hillary will bad for this country.I would rather see Edwards or Obama has President than Hillary. Hillary is a **tch.
2007-01-25 18:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by taylors-turn 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
John Edwards for Pres, Obama for Vice Pres.
2007-01-25 18:09:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by judgebill 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rudy/Obama
2007-01-25 18:26:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To many wrong choices in that bunch of jerks. Try again like your 8-ball says.
2007-01-25 18:28:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
they are all pushing a similar time table! all of them want the status quo. different than one. Ron paul. we are in a position to vote him in so he can initiate making variations interior the spectacular course and start to repair the republic!
2016-11-27 19:35:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rudy! I already contributed to his Exploratory Committe.
http://www.joinrudy2008.com/
2007-01-25 18:10:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
0⤊
1⤋