Can you disprove this statement? Disprove if you can?

Question

I am as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfillment'.

Can you disprove this statement? Disprove if you can?

Answer 1

I'm justOne

Answer 2

Yes I can disprove it For you darlin'. Because the Vedas Were not translated correctly, Hindu mantras and thought patterns are irrelevant. But because I speak Sanskrit, Ill explain, that when translated into English, none of it makes any sence. this is why people are saying "I dont understand the question". One of the first lessons I teach my students is "A hole cannot break itself down into a lower atomic arrangement. So you cannot be "part of a whole, relating to itself. Because it would be "infilling" to the Fulfillment of cessation. Basically, if the statement you said was true, We would all live forever. Better yet, we would not worry about dying. But because everyone has that fear, your statement stands disproved.

Answer 3

I Agree in a different way
"I am as 'part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent, and fulfilment'."
I am a PART of the WHOLE Universe(God) having EQUIVALENCE in all his characteristics, but in some ways there is UNIQUENESS in me due to the LIMIT due to the ego,My LINK with the universe is by the use of my INFLUENCE through the SENSATION of divine ORIGIN, which is a DERIVATIVE, of the RULE and CONDITION imposed for INTENT and liberation of all beings as the final FULFILMENT of the Lords wish.

Answer 4

"You can't miss what you never had." If you have people around you that do have it, it doesn't require very much of a stretch of the imagination to imagine what it would be like if you had it. Let's say you were an orphan and you never knew your parents. You're a child. You go out to a picnic with your friends, and they are all with their parents. As the other children are playing happily with their parents, you start to wonder what it would be like if your parents were there. Then you start to feel sad. While what you think you are "missing" may be imagined in this case, the sadness that one would feel would be very real... So perhaps we are focusing on the semantics, whether we want to call that feeling "missing" or "yearning" for someone. Simply saying that you can't miss something you never had doesn't take away the sadness from knowing that something or someone should be in your life, but isn't in your life.

Answer 5

From the point of view of a physicist, there are too many free and unrelated parameters. Hence it doesn't have to be disproved, because it means nothing.

It may have lost something in the translation. English is not very useful when it comes to describing spiritual concepts.

I should know. I live in the U.S. and participate in recovery programs supposedly based on spiritual principles. No one has ever been able to describe the "spiritual experience" or spiritualism. The common response is "I don't know... it's like a feeling, you know? I just can't describe it...."

See what I mean? Our language has handicapped us that way.

Big AL Mintaka

Answer 6

I am as 'part,whole,equivalence,uniqueness,limit,link,influence,sensation,derivative,rule,condition,intent and fulfillment'. can also be simplified as:I am as all-knowing, omniscient, and omnipotent.
God is all-knowing,omniscient, and omnipotent
ergo, I am as God.

and/or
'I am as I am who I am'
or:
I am as ultimate is


Disproving:
To make I am whole, you need another I am. I am as equivalence, uniqueness would have to need another I am to show comparison. Same as the rest of the key words.
I am therefore can't be as I am without another I am.
and pssst.!!! just curious for a clue.. are you you talking about dualism?
and psst!!!! why do i keep dreaming about your question caught myself talking while asleep repeating this question over and over again?=)

Answer 7

Since you are speaking in the first person, you are in the best position to disprove your own statement.

Answer 8

The statement disproves itself!
"part, whole"... These two words alone are opposites! This is very abstract thinking... So abstract in-fact that it doesn't make sense to me.

Answer 9

Please listen to Thaijiq P. If you can't communicate the question coherantly, why do you bother? You are not going to get any kind of valid answer with an invalid question.

When you can translate properly to english would be a a nice time to ask another question.

This is not a even a question in fact!

Answer 10

it is a contradiction in its self therefore self-disproving. its not even a statement its just an unstuctured mix of words. i hope i havent offended you but its true...

Answer 11

Hon, your questions don't make sense in English.
Listen to the guy who told you that. Ask these questions in your native language.

You keep asking the same thing over and over again.