English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They tend to resort to "racist" labelling.

2007-01-25 16:18:54 · 17 answers · asked by InTROLLigent 3 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

is that really you in the picture? sweet Christ, you need plastic surgery!

2007-01-25 16:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

since you say "They tend to resort to "racist" labelling", I would guess that you tend to generalize about people, which is certainly a racist tendency. How do you know you're winning the argument?

2007-01-25 16:33:39 · answer #2 · answered by lee m 5 · 3 1

You are considered a fellow liberal if you are winning an argument against a liberal. Since liberals tend to check out the facts first, the only time they lose an argument is to another liberal who did a better job of checking out the facts.

2007-01-25 16:24:22 · answer #3 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 4 1

,I'm white and straight and never get labeled as a racist. Therefore, the reason you get identified as a racist must be more than just a label.

2007-01-25 16:28:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well its pretty difficult to win an argument with a liberal because once you lay down some facts they quit participating.

2007-01-25 16:46:26 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 0 0

are you considered a terrorist if you are winning an argument with a conservative?

they tend to resort to "terrorist" labeling...

we could just skip the small talk and yell "racist" and "terrorist" at each other back and forth... save some time...

2007-01-25 16:27:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

Of course, anytime you are being superior to the inferior liberals, you are of course being racist because you are probably white or asian, and, being that whites and asians are generally more intelligent, you are guilty of being superior and making the others feel bad because they are inept at making their arguments because they are deluded or just plain stupid mongrels.

2007-01-25 16:46:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Their in demand tactic looks to both tout their preparation and safeguard for this reason that the muse that they could be incorrect is pretend or they change the challenge and attempt to placed you on the protecting. both way, that's merely a testomony that their regulations can't face as a lot as any valid scrutiny.

2016-12-03 01:43:38 · answer #8 · answered by lesure 4 · 0 0

That's their self defense mechanism. By calling people racists they instantly turn the argument against you. It's a very dirty tactic. It's an easy way for them to bail out of the debate without them having to explain themselves

2007-01-25 16:34:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

if your backing your argument with intelligent facts and statistics, than no argument should be labeled

2007-01-25 16:25:06 · answer #10 · answered by mb 1 · 5 0

Only if you're being a racist.

2007-01-25 16:24:09 · answer #11 · answered by Mrs. Bass 7 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers