Am I creating a new word in English Language if I say, "Yes this election was JEBBED."???????????
2007-01-25 15:32:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Al Gore was such a great choice for President, why didn't his home state of TN support and vote for him? Hmmmm? Bush carried TN in that election.
BTW, why are we STILL harping about the 2000 election?
2007-01-25 19:38:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by jonn449 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Electoral college is a nonetheless a stable gadget and we ought to constantly shop it. The Electoral college became partly designed to tension the applicants to charm to a extensive variety of individuals in lots of states great and small. If we did away with this technique, the applicants could be waiting to concentration on getting votes in different great cities. they might ignore approximately much less populated factor of the country. bear in mind that usa is a union of fifty separate and self reliant states. we at the instant are not in user-friendly terms one enormous usa. On Election Day we don't have one enormous national election, yet particularly we carry 50 separate elections, one for each state. in this form each state determines who they decide to be President. each state has different policies that make certain how their electors interior the college ought to vote. basically approximately all states require all of their electors to vote for the winner of the favored vote for that state. Your vote does count extensive style! each state has electors equivalent to their finished style of congressional seats interior the homestead and Senate. this gives small states like Wyoming and Rohde Island skill interior the Electoral college that's particularly disproportionate to their inhabitants. that's very equivalent to the way those small states have particularly disproportionately greater skill in Congress. This became a compromise that the founding fathers got here up with to sidestep the states with great populations dominating the national government and exercising ordinary administration over smaller states. the certainty that on uncommon events the winner of the Electoral college vote would be different from the winner of the national customary vote isn't an accident or flaw interior the gadget. The national customary vote isn't even reported interior the form. it is basically a extensive style that the information media comments. The founding fathers under no circumstances had any purpose that our President must be elected by skill of way of national customary vote. A constitutional modification could be required to alter the gadget. Small states could under no circumstances comply with ratify such an modification. it is extremely no longer likely that it may ever bypass.
2016-11-27 19:25:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's so unfair about it? Bush won the electoral college votes and that's all there is to it. If you think there's any problems, then blame Florida for the mess they made.
2007-01-25 15:32:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ryan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, the results said several thousands of Jews in Florida voted for Pat Buchannan.
2007-01-25 15:39:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by George B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
To the contrary, it took a great system to work it out the way we did. Look at all the people who were involved, the lawyers and judges that had to make hard decisions. And the 04 election proved that the system worked to our good.
2007-01-25 15:27:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yup. My teacher told me that part of the reason that Bush won was because Bush said he was Christian. Oh, and Bush was the son of a president
2007-01-25 15:25:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was unfair, and it made our government look like a bunch of clowns.
2007-01-25 15:27:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by ME!! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fair enough.---- All is fair in love and politics.
2007-01-25 15:28:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by cuda_carl 1
·
0⤊
0⤋