why not ask what you'll have for breakfast 2 years from now.......its equally moronic
2007-01-25 14:41:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I agree.
2007-01-25 14:48:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah you're right, but just wait until the election after this one. The day after the 08 election someone will anounce they are running for president in 2012. After that people will announce 24 years in advance.
2007-01-25 14:55:07 · answer #2 · answered by kberto 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I always have oatmeal for breakfast..and i probably will two years from now..
but i do not have a clue who i will vote for president in 2008.
i am wishing i could miss the next two years news as I am so sick of hearing the yimmering and yammering of the two political parties..
2007-01-25 14:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well let's see my choices to think about in polotics come to....
1. George W Bush and the second Vietnam in Iraq: (reaches and cocks gun at head , pulls trigger.)
2. Election 2008, a chance to end a horrible mistake and get a real president again ( be it Mc Cain or another Clinton).
question 1 is for the person who sees the glass half empty.
question 2 is for the person who sees the glass half full
Which are you?
2007-01-25 14:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree, I'm seeing all kinds of questions about all of the candidates. Are these people convinced they know enough already? I sure hope not.
Hey you above me. The elections are 22 months away, get a grip.
2007-01-25 15:21:10 · answer #5 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because my mind is made up - Bugs Bunny for president!
He'll still be around in 2 years, the others, I'm not so sure.
2007-01-25 14:51:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everyone wants to predict the future, and will always be wrong since people change their minds as new people announce they will run for office
2007-01-25 14:51:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
GET AN EDUCATION. LEARN STATISTICS. LEARN ABOUT THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
McCAIN OR GUILIANI: IT'S OVER ALREADY
They are both ahead of all Democrats even in NATIONWIDE POLLS, by a whopping 20% or more. That means no Democrat could possibly win the Electoral College.
2007-01-25 15:19:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
IT'S PART OF OUR POLITICAL PROCESS TO INTRODUCE YOU TO VARIOUS POSSIBLE CANDIDATES......WITHOUT THIS WE WOULD BE VOTING FOR UNKNOWN PEOPLE....WE HAVE A SHORT TIME IN WHICH TO HASH OVER THE POSSIBILITIES....ASKING YOU HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT A CANDIDATE IS A WAY TO GET CONTROVERSY STARTED AND POSSIBLY YIELDING A CLOSER CURVE TO THE TRUTH....THEREBY YOU HAVING A BETTER INFORMED WAY TO DECIDE & VOTE..........2 YRS. IS RATHER A SHORT TIME.......
2007-01-25 14:59:22 · answer #9 · answered by Dave F 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because all of the candidates are already causing ruckuses about it, which makes it rather difficult to avoid.
2007-01-25 15:29:44 · answer #10 · answered by Emma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no it's not
I mean people should be able to change their minds between now and then, you're right, but that they give it two years' worth of thought would be great.
november surprises are BS too
2007-01-25 14:48:58 · answer #11 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋