Who is better Rolling Stones or Beatles and Why?
2007-01-25 13:46:33 · 25 answers · asked by guest1742 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
The Beatles by far, more creative, music and lyrics far superior not to mention they were far more attractive.
2007-01-25 13:52:15 · answer #1 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing the Rolling Stones had going for them was one of the coolest (at the time) logos among rock bands of the era. The logo (lips with an exaggeratively protruding tongue through huge white teeth) sent the same message the band did.. a spiteful defiance of propriety and dignity (rapidly going out of style at the time and so readily accepted by fans of the idea). The Beatles held dignity while expressing the right to have freedom and choice. Further, their music was skillfully written and performed well enough to have impressed the entire world into fandom. The Stones were (and remain popular) with those select folks who are more interested in defiance (insert logo here for effect) and anger than they are in a more dignified effort to effect the world positively. The Beatles did do that... they did effect the world and they taught everybody to at the very least, celebrate love.
2007-01-25 14:18:32 · answer #2 · answered by Cat 'n Boots 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Beatles
2007-01-27 16:44:35 · answer #3 · answered by Dawn 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
well I personally like the Beatles better. I love the stones too but I like the Beatles best. They did break a lot of new ground in music and tried things and did/accomplished things no one else had.
2007-01-25 13:55:42 · answer #4 · answered by 'lil peanut 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Beatles.
2007-01-25 14:12:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Beatles, without a doubt. The Stones always were a step (or more) behind them.
2007-01-28 10:01:37 · answer #6 · answered by Daniel P 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Rolling Stones because of the concerts, the way they connect with the audience, the beatles stopped playing live, so they are less cooler than the stones
2007-01-25 14:12:40 · answer #7 · answered by Marcos M 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
actual to me Jeff Hardy might properly be whilst in comparison with Stone chilly in somes techniques I mean they have the two have been given many accomplishments Jeff Hardy is a Mutiple Time international Tag group Champion Stone chilly is a Mutiple WWF Champion beneficial chilly's Accomplishments are Alot greater advantageous yet Jeff's been caught in a drug abuse Plus Jeff has did some issues that Stone chilly can not do like bounce 30 ft interior the air and hitting backflips off cages! My component is the two adult males rule yet in distinctive components
2016-11-01 07:46:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My comparison:
The Beatles were cleaner, while The Stones were rough, dirty, and the like.
I vote the Beatles
2007-01-25 14:14:52 · answer #9 · answered by marajader2d2 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles. Creatively they knew when to quit. At the top of their game.The Stones should have done so 25 years ago.
2007-01-25 13:56:06 · answer #10 · answered by simonbinlauden 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋