In another question regarding Hillary Clinton's question, an asker had wondered if she would be harassed by "Neocon spam trolls"...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlADRfztYBsdoa4hbHgr5zjY7BR.?qid=20070125171304AA39AYp
Wouldn't the same thing happen with the "Neolib spam trolls" if President Bush asked a question?
Is this Liberal Hypocrisy?
2007-01-25 13:03:33 · 10 answers · asked by The Cult of Personality 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Chi Guy...what does that have to do with my question?
Do you suffer from ADD and can't stay on topic? They have drugs for that now, you know!
2007-01-25 13:11:05 · update #1
dinodino...Because I KNOW for a fact that if the President were to ask a question, there would be COUNTLESS answers bashing him...all in the name of free speech. And the asker is implying that the people would would be "trolling" her question would be bad people for expressing their freedom of speech. After all...troll isn't a term of endearment.
2007-01-25 13:15:08 · update #2
If Yahoo really mean's this whole thing about not endorsing one candidate over another they need to have a Republican ask a question on here fast. Actually, they'll need 3, as Oprah and Gore are libs as well
2007-01-25 13:22:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope. The asker was just wondering about possible responses to Hillary's question. Bush doen't fit into it at all. How do you get hypocrisy out of that?
Edit: I don't disagree that "trolls" on the other side would harass Bush if he ever asked a question on YA. My point is that this was NOT an example of "hypocrisy" under any definition of the word.
Edit 2: I worked for the "Fortune 500" for over 20 years, and I'm still mostly liberal, also I know several people ho "have been mugged" and they are still liberals.
2007-01-25 13:11:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it would....but what can you do? No ones going to convert anyone. Trolls on both sides of the aisle in the House and Senate, in ALL the major media, and even on YA .
A liberal is someone who hasn't been mugged....yet. A liberal until they join the Forbes Fortune 500, then see just how much they will have to pay in taxes and get tired of carrying someone else...."Wow! That shoe IS tight!" This is where Republicans and Liberals differ.
It's about values and principals. Both Liberals and Republicans say they have them, but just refuse to compromise on anything. The way this country is dividing, there will almost certainly be grid -lock after this next election.
2007-01-25 13:22:52 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure Yahoo screens the answers to Senator Clinton's question much more closely than they do for the average Yahoo users. The same would be true if President Bush asked a question.
2007-01-25 13:20:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hillary ! No one likes a womanizer like Bill.
2016-03-29 02:48:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton's question:
Do you stupid Americans need help?
2007-01-25 14:12:47 · answer #6 · answered by Taco 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maybe. Isn't the evidence coming out that Cheney was directly involved in outing a CIA agent neo-con treason?
(taking meds) - OK. On topic. I don't understand how the "askr's" question equates to hypocrisy. As a hypocrite, so I thought, does one thing yet preaches the contrary. Would you care to elaborate?
2007-01-25 13:07:24 · answer #7 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋
Liberals are all about hypocrisy. Just sit back and laugh at them and be grateful you are not that dumb
2007-01-25 13:07:47 · answer #8 · answered by John 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
I hate politics. Who cares.
2007-01-25 13:10:46 · answer #9 · answered by Ron P 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush doesn't have the balls to come on YA.
2007-01-25 13:09:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋