2007-01-25 11:55:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes it does, and he can't cover-up his previous lies over the debacle now either, can he.....LOL
2007-01-25 12:40:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 12⤊ 0⤋
they are sending troops one to help the present government benefit administration and to help administration the difficulty. If we enable those miliatia bypass at one yet another greater desirable than probable there won't in any respect be an Iraq anymore. i think of that in case you fairly placed soem concept into this you're able to comprehend that we will no longer in user-friendly terms bypass away. If we did there could be mass chaos interior the middle East as each faction could attempt to learn administration of the country, and inflicting mass chaos isn't probable a stable thought. additionally in case you're so worried over our troops death how approximately you get off your hind end and help with the warfare attempt because of the fact that its probable goign to get them homestead swifter in case you help them then in case you sit down and ***** approximately it. Bush aside those men and ladies individuals are doign what they suspect is stable so do no longer criticized them or pity them help them its the suitable factor you're able to do.
2016-11-27 02:06:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it means a deepened resolve to win the War on Terror and prevent future terrorist attacks. How many attacks have we had since 9/11? None? Maybe that's because we're out on the battlefield combating the evil that is terrorism. I'm not trying to minimize the sadness that the familes of lost soldiers must face, but the death toll isn't that high if you look up WW2 and Civil War stats where hundreds of thousands of people died.
2007-01-25 12:01:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it signals that maybe he finally realizes that we needed to go in there full force and kick butt. If we had done that in the beginning, Iraq would have been long over. You can't have a war and worry what people, like you, are going to say about. You just have to get the job done.
2007-01-25 12:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Bush administration is a failure.
2007-01-25 12:00:07 · answer #5 · answered by PS Drummer 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, would putting more shingles on a leaky roof signify the roof should be torn off and the house abandoned?
Nope, the analogy is not correct at all. This is a sign that we need more support to finish a job.
If you were mowing the lawn, and had a footbal field sized lawn, would it be a failure to send someone to help you? I don't think so, I think that would be good management.
2007-01-25 12:00:59 · answer #6 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It signals desperation and the continued arrogant incompetence of our President.
2007-01-25 13:10:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the failure was the day he got inaugarated the first time
2007-01-25 12:02:55 · answer #8 · answered by AA 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
they have been failing for seven years .it wouldnt be any different from these incompant ingrates.
2007-01-25 12:16:19 · answer #9 · answered by kobe 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if it took you this long to figure that out then there is no hope for you.
2007-01-25 12:01:32 · answer #10 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋