Jarret Jack because Dan Dicku is ahead of him on the depth chart
2007-01-25 11:36:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A toss up between Williams and R. Butler but I think you should drop R. Butler. Both can give you 3s but Williams has an advantage on FT% as compared with R. Butler. Other stats are pretty much the same.
Hedo, Luke and Jack are good contributors.
2007-01-25 13:00:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spurs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey all of those guys are available in my league. Drop Luke, Earl Watsons the man and when Rashard Lweis comes back Luke will get even less time. Keep Jack, he'll return to from in assists. Be patient with him.
2007-01-26 06:20:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Frankie Three Time 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm not sure if there's a "spectacular" thank you to try this, yet i think in case you had a loose spot on your roster, you need to upload and then drop all of the gamers in question and then they must be on the two day waivers. for sure this might take a splash time. nonetheless, possibly you need to have the different vendors each deliver you a score of the gamers which will substitute into availbale, after which you've gotten a sort of pre-ranked "draft".
2016-11-27 02:04:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Butler. He looks to be getting the least amount of playing time in the future. His production has been tailing off lately. The team is looking to go in a new direction it appears.
2007-01-25 15:16:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by vanilla_thunderrr 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i say you get rid of Jason Williams. He's already not getting enough shots to be a worthy fantasy player. And since Oneal is back he will get less and less shots. You should should drop him
2007-01-28 03:35:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kevin M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ridnour, very inconsistent, and shares time with watson
2007-01-25 11:49:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by NYTrader55 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
butler
2007-01-27 09:17:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by phlp_bj 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
jack. all of them are good but jack is the worst.
2007-01-25 12:00:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by varun v 2
·
0⤊
0⤋