if you were landed back in roman times, with nothing, how can u convince romans u were from future?

Answer 1

Likelihood is you just can't.

Technologically advanced artifacts would be beyond their understanding, but would probably not be regarded as admissible evidence.

Predicting history would probably not work, unless you were a classical history professor and knew the annals by heart, like predicting the election results of next year and all important events... but they might just regard you as a gifted seer, and anyway, your presence might cause temporal paradoxes and shift you into a parallel history.

But first, you'd have to learn the language... Latin is a rare skill today, and spoken grade Latin appropriate to the precise year you land into would be a miracle, even for a classics professor.

And don't believe the dross about getting crucified or thrown to the lions and whatnot, you'd have to commit the crime to get the punishment... of course, as a hapless barbarian with no help. you'd still run the risk of being captured and made a slave.

Answer 2

Why would you try? What benefit would it give you?

If, for some reason, I did have to do this, then I would probably try to show them how some modern (ish) devices work - ones more advanced than Roman tech, but not necessarily contemporary with our own time, but this might not be convincing enough.

When I was at uni, we had a task set to imagine that we had gone back in time to the 13th century and tried to convince the local populace (played by the rest of the class) that we were from the future. The class executed every single person who went before them, save for one guy who gave the year for the invention of linen and so the class said they would keep him imprisoned until then, and if he was wrong, then they'd kill him. If the Romans were as unforgiving as that, I'd never even try to convince them I was anything but lost and slightly confused!

Answer 3

Good question; I should think that you would die of plague or similar within a week -our immunity systems would be so unprepared. But, if you survived, and weren't put into slavery, then you'd have to try to find a way of communicating with them -I imagine it would vastly help if you're a latin scholar! Providing you do, then you could tell them basic things, and the understanding behind those things -so long as these things are easily provable. The Romans were very superstitious of course, so in the instance that you convinced them you weren't mad, they'd probably think you are an avatar or manifestation of a god. In short, unless you had particular modern accoutrements on you when in Rome... hehe, then it'd be a very hard task!

Answer 4

If you were totally naked, and didn't know vernacular Latin or Greek, plan on becoming a slave. No way would it be a "Veni, Vidi, Vici" experience; but they would not crucify you. That demise was usually reserved for political activists, like Christ (and later all Christians.)

When you learned the language, then you could start suggesting very humbly and developing some things that the Romans did not have, such as a magnifying glass, telescope or binoculars. They knew how to make glass, but did not concave or convex it....or how about gun powder...a mixture of powdered charcoal, sulfur, and saltpeter, all readily available in ancient Italy.

....or how about the lanteen sail and deep keel for their ships, so that they could sail up wind.

There's lots more simple things that we take for granted that they did not have. Besides being a slave state, the most important differences between Roman technology and ours are gadgets.

If you arrived in your clothes, you'd have no problems. Just about anything you were wearing, would deem you a god...they'd want to learn YOUR language.

Answer 5

not an undemanding question to respond to, no count what your worldview. I won't pretend to have something groundbreaking to share, yet i've got made an attempt to handle this from a Christian attitude (see link under to weblog post). keep in mind that for the period of an atheistic paradigm (a minimum of the uber-scientific sort, not a clean-agey atheism), suffering provides purely as many logical problems, if not extra. as an occasion, why are we able to suffering? Why can we've a great wide awake "inner existence" in any respect if we are in reality purely machines? Evolution works on behaviors, not inner states of ideas, and each thing it has created (wings, eyes, palms yanking decrease back from a warm range, etc) may well be created by way of business guy (a minimum of in theory), yet not expertise. Why can we merchandise to suffering on a deep ethical point, as antagonistic to basically pondering it a count of genetically diverse alternatives (maximum folk like chocolate, maximum folk do in comparison to being merciless to little ones, *shrug*) because it would be in a basically naturalistic paradigm? I do see the subject of evil is a ability argument against God's goodness - a minimum of goodness interior the least confusing experience we assume (there have been moments as a youthful newborn while i presumed my mothers and dads have been "mean"; I lacked understand-how). even nonetheless it fairly is not an exceedingly stable argument against God's existence. Have a stable night, and peace be with you.

Answer 6

You could go into the Colliseum with a liontamer's hat and whip, introduce a new kind of entertainment. Or you could hide Nero's fiddle and prove that fiddling whilst the city burns is really bad PR. Or get Caesar some big fuzzy dice to commemorate the 'the dice is cast' moment.

Answer 7

I'd have to learn Latin real quick, otherwise i'd be looked at as a barbarian, slave, warlocks, messenger from heaven, one of the gods, or some other superstitious-looking devil. I wouldn't remember what to predict, since my detailed knowledge of the time would be limited or meaningless.

The concept of returning from the future would be mighty alien to them, out of fear of the unknown, they'd probably take a swipe at my head with their daggars. I'd try to seek out some of the intellectuals of the time, that would be my best move.

Answer 8

I'd show them my mobile. I know you said "if you were landed back in roman times with nothing..." but I don't go anywhere without my mobile phone, not even to do a bit of time travelling.

Answer 9

You probably wouldn't be able to. But boy if you knew your roman history wouldn't you have fun predicting the future for them.

Answer 10

I wouldn't even try they loved to put imbeciles in the arena , userly with a wild animal for a laugh