Why is spanking with the intentions of correcting your child considered wrong in this country.?

Question

When I was younger it seemed as though children were more well-behaved then they are now. Children respected their parents more, and also respected there elders. Violence is out of control. Teen attacks on society happens more often. These attacks and attitudes were not that common 30 years ago. I know a spanking here or there from a switch, board, or hand made me have a lot better judgement in some of the decisions I had made. Could there be at least a small hint of truth that corporal punishment at home and at school really does help.

Answer 1

Because people want to call it abuse. It is NOT abuse. Abuse is beating a kid bloody or hitting with closed fists, kicking, etc. A good bare bottomed spanking is punishment not abuse.

Answer 2

Because it doesn't get the result intended. Violence breeds violence.
I was spanked and I resent that very much and still cannot forgive my mum for that.
My daughter was never spanked and she is a funny, respectful and polite teenager. She's also a grade A student!
It's not the spanking that makes the difference, it's the way parents bring up their children. And far too often parents today are either too young or too lazy to do the job correctly.

Answer 3

i think of by way of fact there's a womb and the tummy to shroud us from seeing the violence happening to the unborn. Plus, abortion is all regarding the female, no longer what's happening to her toddler... a baby is seen and as with each and every liberal, they base their judgements on inaccurate emotions-seeing a bratty baby getting a deserved smack on the tush reasons the liberal techniques to experience undesirable by way of fact it extremely is bodily uncomfortable for the baby, somewhat than they simply comprehend that this act will interior the long-term help mildew solid habit in that baby... upload-to assert the unborn are no longer human is previous boastful. the dimensions of a guy or woman, state of dependency on yet another, and "viability" do no longer do away with or upload to the humanity of a guy or woman. There are people who're 4'7" totally grown and people who're over 7'-could the taller be allowed to homicide short people? What approximately fat people murdering the skinny? There are people who're adults that are wheelchair certain, remember on pacemakers to stay to tell the story, want insulin, and so on-could we be allowed to end their lives because they are no longer totally self preserving? What a pair of born baby-they truthfully won't be able to look after themself without our help till they are properly into their toddlers-up till then could or no longer it extremely is criminal back to a decision they could die?

Answer 4

I'm not qualified to answer. My only real frame of reference is Super Nanny or whatever that show is. She appears to get those horrid children in line without ever having to lay a hand on them.

I do NOT think it should become a punishable offense. That is just ****** up.

So long as they never outlaw its usage in the bedroom.....

Answer 5

Although I agree with the premise of your argument. I would have a difficult time allowing the school board or anyone within the school to lay a hand on my child.

Recent studies actually disprove the theory that corporal punishment adversely affects children. I agree.

Answer 6

Politicians being ridiculous. They just don't want it to get out of hand, as in beating a child, but they are irrational and freak out about spanking.

Answer 7

Nanny state politicians wanting to take over more and more of people's lives.

Answer 8

Because the government likes to stick their noses in where they don't belong.

Answer 9

At home, I would agree that yes, absolutely.
At school, No.

Answer 10

Because you are teaching them at an early age that violence is the solution to problems