2007-01-25 09:31:53 · 7 answers · asked by Bruce G 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
Yes. Therefore, I concede that Congress should not procede.
2007-01-25 09:43:29 · answer #1 · answered by Big D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because "pro" isn't the opposite of "con". "Pro" has a positive connotation, such as "proton","pro-capitialism". Con simply means more than one, such as two, three, four things working together and or being connected. Ex: adj. "Conjoined" --joined together, "congress" might essentially be a verb converted into a noun. For example (verb) to congress, meaning to work together to make progress...
2007-01-26 06:21:54 · answer #2 · answered by Researcher of Knowledge 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes by the way you put it, but congress is reasposible for voting on bills, giving organizations money, and so much more. Just Read a copy of the constituion.
2007-01-25 17:36:57 · answer #3 · answered by coinman090388 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because pro doesnt stand for progress and con doesnt stand for congress
2007-01-25 17:51:09 · answer #4 · answered by djeff95 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is this? Do you read the archives to find questions? This one has been asked so many times that it should be prohibited.
2007-01-25 17:37:00 · answer #5 · answered by istitch2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I like your reasoning.
2007-01-25 20:14:46 · answer #6 · answered by miketwemlow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.
2007-01-25 17:38:07 · answer #7 · answered by stick man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋