Why not impeach our president?

Question

If everybody hates Bush so much and nobody agrees with what he says and he is such a joke, Why haven't we impeached him?

Answer 1

Because a crime is required for that. Remember the impeachment of Bill Clinton? Remember what a joke it was? That is what would happen is Bush was impeached. The Senate would have to have a hearing on the evidence. The Senate is anything but impartial, so a fair hearing is impossible. The determination of guilt or innocence would be a party-line vote. Just like it was with Bill Clinton. Facts wouldn't matter. Saving face for the party would. Either party. That is why the Dems won't impeach. They would look silly like the Reps did when they impeached Clinton.

Answer 2

There is a big difference in disagreeing with a president and thinking he has made major mistakes constantly (both of which I do), and establishing as a fact that he has committed acts (criminal or other) worthy of impeachment and removal from office. Impeachment is just the trial to determine if an office holder should be removed. Even if he were to be impeached I doubt there would be enough votes for removal. Also, one must seriously look at the impact to the nation to go through that again.

Answer 3

Our system of government is a democratic republic, not mob rule democracy.

There are guidelines for removing a President from office, impeachment is the first step of that process. But there has to be legal grounds for impeachment, such as a felony act or treason. Just because people don't like him is not a justification for impeachment.

Answer 4

First, the president has to break a law. He hasn't.

Second, everybody does NOT hate Bush. Most Americans generally support him. That's the real reason why democrats won't go near impeachment procedings, cut the funding for the troops or roll back his tax cuts.

Democrats in Congress are well aware that anything like this would be political suicide, and this is the best indication that the people of America are siding with Bush and his policies.

Answer 5

I would like to think that is because both houses of Congress are wise enough to know that the disruption of an impeachment proceeding would play right into the Islamic terrorists' hands - they do not deserve or need the added incentive of believing that their tactics of terror and murder have helped bring about the impeachment of an American president.

They have repeatedly claimed that will eventually "topple our government."
Let's not help them - instead, let's concentrate on defeating our real enemies with a united effort - new policies and objectives - instead of all of this in house bickering and division.
We are, after all, The UNITED States.

Answer 6

In short there are only two reasons:

1. The President has not commited any impeachable offences.

2. Three words the Democrats don't want to hear: " President Dick Channey" (note: since Mr Channey doesn't make any decisions, he can't be charged with anything)

Answer 7

Because no one in Washington can follow through with anything. It is our right to be able to impeach him but how often has it happened in our history and compare that to how often the general public disagrees with our presidents. If you want a voice than start campaigning for someone else in 2008.

Answer 8

i did no longer vote for Bush the two time, nor did I ever vote for his Dad, yet a President can purely be impeached for "intense crimes and misdemeanors". regrettably, Congress voted to offer Bush particular conflict Powers as Commander-in-chief. The Iraqi conflict decision reported that militia rigidity could be used as a "very final motel". it is an extremely huge assertion. It became as much as Bush to make the call as Commander in chief. As for rights violations right here at abode, you may thank your community Congressman/woman or Senators for balloting for the Patriot Act. by ability of how, the government even needs to renowned what type of books you check out on the library and what matters you "google"!! we gained't impeach him because of the fact Congress gave him carte blanche approval. The President additionally has in his potential to concern government Orders if he feels as though the regulations or regulations do no longer pass a techniques adequate in preserving the yank human beings. many circumstances he went previous what Congress authorized by ability of issuing EO's to stay clean of the legislative branch. All Presidents have performed it to three volume, yet Bush has performed it on a common foundation. it is why he hasn't vetoed any expenses. He did no longer ought to. What we'd desire to do is to computer screen who we vote for interior the destiny!! hear to all the subject concerns and make clever judgements.

Answer 9

Being that you're VERY young, since you obviously haven't been instructed in a CIVICS class, and think that just because people don't like the president, don't agree with what he says and is such a joke, he can be impeached....I'll just laugh...hahahahaha.

Answer 10

You can't just impeach the president because you don't agree with him. It doesn't work like that. And for the 1,000,000th time, Congress approved for the war, he has broken no laws, he is well within his boundaries as Commander in Chief to order a surge if he truly thinks it will work. I would just like to see some laws that he has broken. Politicians don't break the law, they just tweak around it a little bit to work towards their advantage. this is what politicians do, and if anybody knows the game, it's the president and his advisors. All presidents do this.