2007-01-25 08:54:42 · 11 answers · asked by yuske ichigo naruto 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Real lasting peace only comes after victory. Peace means you have to let dictators like Hitler and Saddam take over the world because you're too scared to lift a finger. Imagine a world of Neville Chamberlains.
2007-01-25 08:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by x 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There would be no cons I guess. I suppose there would be a problem with over crowding because nobody would die. Put there are so many pro's. I would like everybody to live as well as I do, I hate seeing all the mess on the news, it wouldn't be a con not having that anymore, that would be a pro.
2007-01-25 17:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadly, no. People are an interesting animal... Do you know what beavers, elephants and people have in common? They change their environment to suit themselves. Now know what People have in common with rats and pigeons? They turn on each other when crowded. Taking these two considerations into view the only way to bring about world peace is the mass killing of say, 5 billion people. then theres more than enough room, resources, and space between the various groups to insure that they will all get along.
2007-01-25 17:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by secondscotts 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The cons of world peace??? I can't really think of one. The pros well we won't have to worry about being nuked anymore for one.
2007-01-25 16:59:44 · answer #4 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I were producing a hollywood movie...sure, anything can happen.
In real life..I know better. For example. there is a group of people on this earth who have a very differant believe system than I, & I think a majority of people do. This group wants to kill everyone who doesnt believe in the same things they do. I dont believe there is anyway to reason with these types of people.
2007-01-25 17:05:41 · answer #5 · answered by john 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all good. The only "con" I can think of is that everbody will breed like happy little bunnies, causing gross overcrowding of living space and resources, with will put the kibosh on world peace and put us back to square one.
2007-01-25 17:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Providing anyone had that power, why ask why? It would be pro, pro all the way!
2007-01-25 16:59:05 · answer #7 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Impossible. Sorry.
2007-01-25 16:57:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont know it would be good because no one would be dying but it would be bad because no one was dying and it would be like too perfect like nothing to watch on the news and nothing to be sad about. i dont know.
2007-01-25 16:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by kay 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
do your own homework
2007-01-25 16:57:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋