ie: campaign spending, the accumulation of funds from who and where? media coverage with rules of conduct ? advertisements committed to specific candidates own agendas, restricted from slander and material other than their own point of view? candidates elected to terms ie Senator Clinton of New York be required to serve out terms voted in my constituents and in good faith? or full disclosure they will be mid term with appointees on the ballot as well?
COMPLETE to the penny dollar and sense explaination where campaign funds came from, how they were spend and accountability?
Statements made to include accountability as does a first year college student have with a bibliography for a term paper ? all available on request or not stated at all?
Regulations regarding new online chats now in use in a discovery
mode but subject to review and/or revoke of priviledge? Age limits registered voters only how do they register? start with basics not bashing? clean slates built on
2007-01-25 08:27:38 · 3 answers · asked by Mele Kai 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
This would be a great start! But realistically, the Liberal Media, Politicians, and the Hollywood Rich will not permit this to happen!
2007-01-25 08:38:48 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should we need such restrictions? The process is already filled with requirements and paperwork to file... shouldn't we be electing people we actually have faith in? Shouldn't we be electing people we truly feel will serve us and the public? Shouldn't all elected officials have a certain air of ethics about them? As our electoral process stands now only the VERY wealthy can even run for a serious office. Hell, even running for school board requires paperwork, signatures, disclosure, fund disclosures, and a minimum of $15,000.
2007-01-25 16:44:32 · answer #2 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a broad question. But let's just start by making campaigning before 2008 illegal.
2007-01-25 16:36:25 · answer #3 · answered by Gremlin 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋