D for sure
You get a population to separate, usually from geographic means then they start getting new genes etc. Mutations are the key to new species, but the isolation must happen first.
2007-01-25 08:31:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by dukeman_5 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's definitely d. Physical isolation is the only sure way of keeping a separate gene pool. Polyploidy does not always reproductively isolate offspring. And mate selection and adaptive isolation both involve geographic overlap, and while they will cause speciation eventually, physical isolation is the most drastic and common form of speciation
2007-01-25 08:57:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Emz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In nature,
D. Physical isolation of populations
Isolated islands tend to "breed" unique species not found anywhere else in the world.
2007-01-25 08:27:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
diesel fumes acids sulphur and metals create brand new life forms and types with polymers, and with amino acids of existing life forms enzigms or they simply complify brand new chemobiology angiogenically.
Despite visible extinctions on the planet we likely have a lot more "new" life forms to discover yet,
kinda scairy really eh they make themselves.
Ob1
2007-01-25 08:30:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by old_brain 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say 'all of the above'. I don't think there is a consensus in the speciation community as to what factor is most important.
2007-01-25 09:17:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by plantgirl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
physical isolation allows populations to change dramaticaly
2007-01-25 09:43:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by wesnaw1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mate selection i think
2007-01-25 08:19:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A for sure
2007-01-25 08:19:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by campbell412 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's either A or D.
2007-01-25 08:18:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by OwNaGeR 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would think answer b....is it right?
interesting question
2007-01-25 08:18:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋