only candidates with money are represented. i say we begin publically funding elections so that we aren't simply choosing between the millionaires, businessmen and celebrities that seem to be able to afford it.
2007-01-25 08:19:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by uncle osbert 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think it is content. I think that there really is no other choice as campaigns are VERY expensive. Look at the amount of wealth that most of them have, they are still asking for donations to help fund the campaign. I would have no problem voting for someone that was not wealthy, as long as they were educated and the best qualified.
2007-01-25 08:23:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by msdeville96 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the person with the most money wins, then John Kerry would be president.
The Democratic Party is run by millionaires and billionaires who pay as few taxes as possible...
Ted Kennedy
Nancy Pelosi
John Edwards
George Soros
et all
-Aztec276
2007-01-25 08:22:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Quick, name a politician with a middle class income. Oh, thought so.
Give me a break.
2007-01-25 08:18:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
So poor candidates would be more qualified?
I don't understand the question.
2007-01-25 08:19:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by DannyK 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No,just the dumbest.
2007-01-25 08:22:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is fine with them, if he has a lot of money, he must know what he is doing.
2007-01-25 09:13:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have NO choice that's the way it is.
2007-01-25 08:19:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋