It seems to me that people are more willing to elect an inferior candidate for president for the sensationalism of having a woman prez and making history than electing the best person for the job.
Is this a joke?
2007-01-25 06:44:28 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The "best candidate" Never wins!!! It's always been more of a popularity contest than anything else. (Who has the most 'name recognition.')
2007-01-25 06:59:29 · answer #1 · answered by pinduck85 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who is best backed with large amounts of money.who looks good.who is well known.is white.is a Democrat, as a republican want get the next election.and maybe just some people will vote for a suitable experienced women just because she's a women, Many women may vote that way, but it will balance out with Democrats voting for a Republican just because the candidate is not a women as bias still runs some of course in this country.I do not think she should run because she may lose the election just for the fact shes a lady. not a man.a man needs to run against the republicans to make sure the democrats win, another Republican would about completly ruin this country. even more then Bush did,God help us all. if a republican gets in after bush, It will prove they controlled and thieved the last election and the one before that, Theirs evil in the Federal government.we need to stay more aware and not believe all the propaganda and lies they spew out.Y'all.
2007-01-25 18:22:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id vote hillary because shes got 8yrs experience, shes on the working mans side and shes democrat, i mean shes barely a woman, i just like her issues
2007-01-25 14:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by raztis 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋