was he considered more of a radical than dr king?
2007-01-25 06:34:04 · 8 answers · asked by portraitoftracy222 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
That is one of my favorite movies. Yes, he was considered more radical than MLK. But, they both wanted pretty much the same things.
2007-01-25 06:48:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think He was a little more radical, than Dr king, but they both wanted the same thing for African Americans. Martin Luther King message was peaceful, and Malcolm X's was by any means neccessary.
2007-01-25 06:41:07 · answer #2 · answered by danicolegirl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have JUST now seen this movie? Damn. Okay....well 1st the movie is excellent. 2nd, yes he is considered more of a radical. Dr. King was more about peace bringing about a change. Malcolm was about by any means necessary including force & violence to bring a change. At least he was before his conversion to the Nation of Islam.
2007-01-25 06:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by Raynebow_Diva 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
6 solutions and not one among them reported the real answer. Now for the real answer: quickly after Spiderman 3 got here out, SONY photos reported they have been gonna do 3 greater video clips, and had deliberate on the time to maintain a similar forged of Maguire and Dunst, and Director Sam Ramni. whether over the subsequent 12 months or so, disagreements between SONY and Sam Ramni began over factors of ways the 4th movie could be made (dont comprehend the main factors). Sam Ramni began speaking of throwing in the towel, and Dunst and Maguire reported user-friendly and easy that they does no longer stay if Ramni left. while Sam end, they end interior minutes.
2016-11-27 01:32:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he started out as a radical (jail will do that to you). But after he performed the Hajj he began to rethink his position. He saw how the Nation of Islam was more of a cult than a religion, and he backed away from some of the hatred that he was knon for early. there he evidence that He and Malcom were think of unifying the two movements (that might explain why both of them were assassinated).
King was about integration and assimilation
Malcom was about Black nationalism.
same debate as Booker T. v. Web Dubios
2007-01-25 07:21:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At first he was portrayed a radical because he himself was uneducated about the Muslim practices. Once he found out the truth behind his religion(that all men are equal black and white) he opened his eyes and changed his ways. But Muhammed's group wasn't having it. They weren't going to let one man destroy what they built "Ignorance". I truly gained much respect for this man once I saw the movie. He is an example of CHANGE.
2007-01-25 09:40:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Macolm X had the answer for his people. Dr. King was DR. King if you know what I mean. It was sad that Macolm was ASSASSINATED by the nation with the help of the FBI. One can only wonder how different things would have turned out for AFRICAN AMERCIANS had Macolm lived.
2007-01-25 06:45:54 · answer #7 · answered by Monty L 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Malcolm X is one of my heroes.
you should read his autobiography.
I DON'T THINK HE WAS RADICAL
I THINK AMERICA WAS RADICAL AT THE TIME.
HE WAS HONEST.
imo
2007-01-25 07:13:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋