Yes yes absolutely because 90% re offend , Why give them a second chance to destroy our children's lives, It is time to stand up for our children and say enough is enough,
2007-01-25 10:13:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Tara 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Rapists and child molesters are the bottom of a toilet scum. Therefore, I think they should literally rot in prision.
I am not for the death penalty so my opinion is a little biased.
However, the death penality given to these people will never happen. Unless some vigilante strikes.
2007-01-25 06:11:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Callie 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think it would be hard to sell since not even that many murderers get the death penalty and those who do spend 20 or more years on death row making appeal after appeal after appeal.
The death penalty is largely gone in the United States.
2007-01-25 06:08:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sean 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If want be, surely certain. yet an option decision might want to be castration yet then they could probable turn to killers. So the lack of existence penalty might want to be the answer. human beings seem to ignore about the sentiments of the victims and their households. the challenge with leaving them in penal complex is taxpayers money, prisons in the present day are like usa golf equipment or well being spas. that would not appear like punishment to me. certain, they are with the final penal complex inhabitants & i'm effective some day , they are going to be killed in a no longer so spectacular way. yet lower back, why ought to we pay to keep them residing very delicate? merely would not make any experience to me.
2016-12-03 01:07:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by lemanski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree with the death penalty in the case of rapists and molesters. I do think they should be put into the general population and be forced to live among all the other convicts in maximum security. It's a non sanctioned death penalty.
2007-01-25 06:22:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by jtrodog 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Agreed, but our judicial system is in a terrible state. Really weird sentences given out:
IE ~ A drunk driver crashed into a house, didn't kill anyone but due to his license status and severity of his accident and blood alcohol level ~ he got life in prison.
Compare that to a woman that murdered her husband, served 12 years and was released on probation.
How does that make any sense?
2007-01-25 06:26:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by DJFresh 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
You may not know that 48 of 50 states now have life without parole on the books. You can see whether your state has it by visiting
/www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=555&scid=59. Life without parole means what it says.
As it is now, there are so many problems with the death penalty.
Why would we want to make it worse?
2007-01-25 07:45:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Susan S 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
In my world vision, we would establish an island where we woul drop off child molesters and rapists - no food, no housing, nothing. It would be located so far from any inhabited location that if someone actually managed to escape, they get to go free. Cheaper than prison.
2007-01-25 06:13:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by dashel_gabelli 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
I agreed except that they should not sit on death row for some ten years using up tax payers money. The maxium time should be no longer than three years.
2007-01-25 06:11:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by miss-snoopy 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
For those who say "nobody died."
A big part of you dies inside. You
are altered from that day forward.
The people who commit these crimes,
Cannot be rehabilitated, C A N N O T!
Type in........ Familywatchdog.US
Check out your own neighborhood.
For those of us that have been on
the other end of these crimes.........
Death is an easy way out for these
types of criminals. They deserve
much worse. For them the ordeal is over.
For the rest of us, we live with it for
the rest of our lives. It effects us everyday.
2007-01-25 06:22:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋