of the word conspiracy? There is sooo much evidence of 9/11 being an inside job it's a joke, but people are so hellbent on avoiding any information regarding a possible conspiracy because it'd put the "conspiracy nut" label on their forehead. They don't do any research, they just "know" such a thing would be impossible. They live in a world where Fox News and CNN tell it all how it really is. I'm fine with people not buying a certain theory, whatever, we each have our opinions. But it annoys the hell out of me when people don't care to even look to find out.
Ok I'm done.
2007-01-25
05:47:35
·
8 answers
·
asked by
someguy
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
I think people have failed to realize this question isn't directed towards people who have actually done legit research on the topic, and still don't buy into the theory. As I already explained, what bothers me is when people are ignorant about everything that is a little off about 9/11 and still are 100% sure it isn't a conspiracy. Stop looking for ways to be offended and start reading what I'm saying.
2007-01-25
06:04:19 ·
update #1
Just because somebody screams "Conspiracy" doesn't make it true....
I think that rather than blaming everything on our government just because you are discontent with it, you should do some real research and find out what the real truth is, since it has been biting you in the a** since 9/11 happened, you just want to b*t** and blame everything on our government....
I think that if somebody should get a clue, it should start with you.
Oh yes....I'm done as well now...
2007-01-25 05:55:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by lc 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
First, I would like to say that i agree with you 100%!! Don't be so closed minded and research your options!! I think everone is so hellbent on discrediting the conspiracy evidence because they are brainwashed by the media! John Mayer said it best in his song "Waiting on the world to Change", he says, "when you trust your television, what you get is what you got, because when you own the information, you can bend it all you want!" Also I think that people are too afraid to believe that our government (the government that is supposed to protect us) would do something like this. But face it, our government is corrupt!! I have read few books about the 9/11 conspiracy and they point out way too many things that just don't make sence. For example, during the attacks, the president was reading at a elementary school to the students, we saw it on the news when his protective services wispered in his ear that America was under attack. If America is under attack, would our president be at high risk!?!? Wouldn't they have rushed him out of there in the quickness to try to protect him since it was well known that the president was there!?!? But they didn't, he stayed there and finished the reading and then left. ok if he did it to not upset the children, what's worse, a room of crying kids or America loosing their president?!?! Second, is it just coincidence that the president's brother owns the security company that secures the Trade Towers and just so happened to have all of the security cameras off the weekend before the attack to do some rewiring in both buildings. Third, the fire from the plane's fuel in the Trade Towers could not reach the temperature to melt steel, they have tested how high the temp could get from the fuel and it is way lower than what would be needed to melt steel, so why did the towers collapes?!?! And how come they both fell straight down in their own footprint, like a demolition project!?!? I think the president wanted to start this War, but didn't have good enough evidence to get the Americans to support him on it so he gave us a good reason. Like Hitler said, "If you make your people feel threatened, they will follow you in anything." Granted, I am not trying to say our president is the next Hitler or anything like that, I just think that there is a lot of evidence to support that he was a part of it or knew about it before hand! I am not trying to convince you to believe what i believe, i just think that you should open your mind and see the posibilities!
2007-01-26 04:48:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by flowergirlsdy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not by the word conspiracy. It's because the so call "facts" aren't correct or valified. Usually the sources of evidence of an inside job isn't credible. You could have 10 people claim they have knowledge of an inside job event though they don't. And that would classify "as sooo much evidence." The claims I looked at were really poor. Most take no account of the actual way the buildings collapse. It couldn't have happened with explosives. After a while it comes down to paranoid people with too much time on their hands.
2007-01-25 05:55:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Part of this is because when one does the effort and work to investigate said conspiracies, they quickly discover why it has that label.
The "evidence" against a 9/11 conspiracy is overwhelming, which is why there are so many "hellbent" against the evidence for it.
This is truly a case of overwhelming proof, and it is intellectually dishonest to not accept that.
2007-01-25 05:54:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elijah 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Your so-called evidence is a joke. If you look at the actual "evidence" you jokers post, then you'd see where the fault lies. Maybe if you didn't use sites that are reknowned for their anti-semitic and anti-science point of views. Maybe if you actually used facts instead of hear-say, then people would have a tendency to believe you. As is, all you have is rumor and conjecture. It all adds up to be good works of fiction.
You can't accept the fact that there are those that hate us and will try to kill us.
2007-01-25 05:58:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by darkemoregan 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
If there is soooooo much evidence of a conspiracy, why didn't you list any of it?
2007-01-25 05:55:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
it upsets the delicate balance of their media inspired self image .... and imo theres alot of govt employed bloggers spreading misinformation to confuse public opinion also ...
2007-01-25 05:51:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
people are quick to discredit the evidence because it is that easy to discredit. bite me.
2007-01-25 05:50:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋