2007-01-25 05:44:32 · 10 answers · asked by NyteMayR 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
alot later or a lot sooner ,all depends on who bush goes after if he pulls out because for example the congress has cut funding and tied his hands well it would be his shame and he would be ridiculed worlwide so he has to take it out on someone...why not iran provoke them and go after them...why not syria or north korea go after them in pretense to defending south korea ...he will think of something to do ,the only way now that the troops will be pulled from iraq like i said is if the house/senate forces his hand and cuts funding and implements other sanctions on him and his policy...he wont go down quietly i tell you not in any way at all...so it all depends on what he does thats going to determine how close the world is to ending all courtesy of g.w
2007-01-25 06:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by combatmedic2010 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as soon as we pull out of Iraq, the country will go into Chaos, but for the world ending that is a million dollars question that man from the beginning of time wants to know. The only one who know for sure is the one who created it, GOD.
2007-01-25 06:37:24 · answer #2 · answered by Phenix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The end of the world has no connection to the police action in Iraq, and if that part of the world wants to be as screwed up as it has always been let them have at it..
2007-01-25 06:15:25 · answer #3 · answered by xyz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats just it. The war would never end at that point. You'd see Syria and Iran roll through Iraq and end up in Baghdad fighting it out. Syria would be crushed quickly, and Iran would increase it's strength 10 fold. After that Pakistan would get nervous and get in on the fight and once Pakistan gets rolling, India would take that window of opportunity to clain Kashmir once again. then Pakistan would get upset and launch Nukes on India as well as I ran. Talk about a bad situation getting worse. WW3 would now have it's climatic part in worlds history. Unfortunately, no one would be left to document the end of the world as we know it.
2007-01-25 05:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by Frank K 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It won't really be our problem anymore if it ended.
We would not have to worry about it, but it might make other countries think we are cowards. But I think we would do the right thing and not deal with it. We had nothing to do with it. Saddam died because of the major damage he did on Iraq. Saddam did not blow up the WTC or Pentagon. Since he is dead, why are we even still involved with Soonys or Shiites?
2007-01-25 05:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How are you certain that there is a direct link between the two?
No one knows when the world will end - not Jesus nor the angels. To use an old saying, 'Only God knows'.
2007-01-25 05:48:10 · answer #6 · answered by Oklahoman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A lot later
2007-01-25 05:47:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ITHE REAP[ER HAS ALREADY TOLD ALL OF YOU WHEN IT IS TIME TO HARVEST THE GARDEN OF GOD
2007-01-25 05:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have nothing to fear but fear itself.
2007-01-25 05:57:43 · answer #9 · answered by Unoptrid1aq 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe two more weeks.
2007-01-25 16:48:39 · answer #10 · answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋