Interesting question. Notwithstanding, it is a little premature because she is not yet the Democratic candidate.
As a nation we elect our leaders for any number of reasons, often simply as opposition to some other candidate. And as a nation we get what we deserve for electing people to office (any) without REALLY figuring out who is the best person available for the job.
We will get all sorts of unqualified officials (democrat and republican alike) until the voting public starts thinking clearly
2007-01-25 05:24:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by hhabilis 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think everyone should be given a fair opportunity to run. Now, whether or not she is going to win is another question. I dont feel this country is ready for a woman president. Being a woman, I can say that. :) There is way too much going on with our country right now and lets face it, women respond differently to men. We are more emotional, caring, sincere, etc.. and some people would take advantage of that. She only stayed with her husband for political reasons. No woman with PRIDE would have put up with that. And I have to stick up for the men when I say not all husbands cheat. If that is your mindset, good luck finding Mr. Right. Ok back on track- We cannot have a president in office who wants to pull the troops out. Too many times in the past we have done this thinking that there was going to be some good outcome by it. We go into war, pull the troops out, go into war, pull the troops out. This is what we did with The Gulf War and Desert Storm and it didnt get us anywhere. Look at Pearl Harbor-we finished the job now Japan is one of our biggest allies. So, with that being said, we need to keep the troops in to finish the job so we wont have anything to worry about from now on.
2007-01-25 05:32:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by danielle h 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Vow! are you a man or a woman born with a penis protruding out of your head? How many great MAN also could run his family purrrfect?
Why not pussycat? look at what a "real purrfect family man" running our country right now! you know we have had actors and wrestlers running the show of this country and the state, why not a competent and able woman? what have you gotten against a woman? I tell you what the possible answers for you to choose:
1) If you are a woman, you feel so inferior against and so envious of Hillary Clinton and you have not gotten Bill Clinton like she did... Some people just dream to be Hillary or Monica and couldn't so they criticized others to hide their inner ugly desires, flaws and incompetencies... It is psychologically proven!
2) If you are a man, you desperately feel inferior to and against a woman of competency and intelligence - definitely higher than yours! You can lie or do anything evil but a woman can not! because naturally you believe that she should be under you like your bible might say with your male ego-elaborated interpretation, hahaha...
Have a good life juveniles!!! I am no fan of no one. Common sense rules!
2007-01-25 05:35:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by voilamonamour 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
No she should not. And to the smart remarks by others, well if you can't ride a bike w/ 2 wheels why give you 4 wheels and a motor. And as far as husbands cheating goes As the President of our country you sent as an example to others so if it is all right for him to cheat then that makes it alright for every man in America to do so too. NOT!! Wake up people no wonder our country is in trouble.
2007-01-25 05:34:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by dkajunprincess 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would not vote for her, she is not the one I want for the first woman president. She is weak and would crumble under the pressure. Just look at how she runs her home. She should of kicked Bill to the curb a long time ago and stood on her own two feet but she was to scared to do it. She is weak.
2007-01-25 05:33:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by sunshine_rae 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
guess who else is endorsing McCain/Palin-none different that Donald Trump. Now Trump is conscious money and he's conscious who will kill off each and every of the small companies and deliver enormous agency off shore. shall we face it, lots of the vast agency in this u . s . a . can do properly distant places and not get socked for a million/2 their revenue to Obama and his gang of thugs. Be Bop a rest room l. a., could we predict a violation be conscious quickly???
2016-12-16 13:23:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our country was in a far better state when Clinton was in office than it is now. So definitely Hillary should go for it again. Maybe she can clean up the mess we're in. And BTW, people are allowed to have personal lives, it shouldn't be of any concern to us. Husbands cheat every day, there's nothing special about that.
2007-01-25 05:20:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
She has the chance to run as much as anyone else does. I dont know that she was running the country once before and neither do you unless you were there.
2007-01-25 05:35:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by mnwomen 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Absolutely not.
I'm all for having a woman president someday, as long as it isn't her. I don't agree at all with her politics, or her selfishness.
I don't think I'm alone when I say it's time for a fresh surname in office, we need to steer away from the Bush-Clintion-Bush-Clinton revolving door.
2007-01-25 05:27:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Karma 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
We allowed a second shrub to run our country for eight years, why not allow a second Clinton? And what does running your house have to do with running the country? Do you think people that can't ride bicycles should not drive cars?
2007-01-25 05:21:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by jelay11 2
·
1⤊
4⤋