English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-25 04:37:26 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

18 answers

Absolutely not!!

Why?

Because Bush has:

- Killed over 3,000 Americans on foreign soil

- Killed over 3,000 Americans on domestic soil (aka 9/11)

- Killed over 600,000 innocent Iraqi civilians

- Gotten the NSA to spy on Americans (wiretapping)

- Tortured detainees (some to death)

- Tried to pass a law that would restrict social security for the poor

- Had a homosexual relationship with Jeff Gannon (Johnny Gosh)

- Attempted to create a North American Union that would leave the borders of Canada and Mexico wide open.

- Fired every cabinet member and general who disagreed with him

- Divided this country to pre-civil war status

- Turned our allies against us

- Worked for the New World Order and still is.

That's just a couple out of a thousand I will mention on this post.

2007-01-25 05:33:47 · answer #1 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 3 5

I do help my u . s . a . and my President. i might desire to pass on all day why, yet instead, i'm going to answer your question ffirst with a question: the place in hell do you think of this u . s . a . could be right this moment with the likes of Kerry on the helm? we'd have already surrendered to the terrorist and we in all hazard could be in an entire out melancholy. additionally, the left needs to think of of this formerly bashing our currant administration: a million. No on soil terrorist assaults considering the fact that we took the combat to them. 2. economic gadget on a rapid music. 3. abode possession at an all time checklist intense. 4. Unemployment at an all time low. 5. inventory industry (Dow) at an all time intense. purely some strategies.

2016-11-01 06:35:46 · answer #2 · answered by dewulf 4 · 0 0

One cannot support a President that makes decisons based on ego, money, and power. If we all decided to support him 100% he would run rampant destroying this Country for good.

2007-01-25 04:58:09 · answer #3 · answered by Lou 6 · 2 1

I supported him in his efforts in Afganistan but I have always felt like the whole Iraq thing was just an excuse to finish what his father didn't. I support the troops but we didn't need to go to Iraq when we weren't finished in Afganistan

2007-01-25 04:49:14 · answer #4 · answered by T.K. 1 · 2 0

Would be Un-American to say I do not support him. I believe he is doing what is best for the country and the world. If we pull out as we did in Vietnam years ago that entire part of the world will fall into mass civil war. And with Terrorist which have already attacked us in control who knows what else they might do to us or another country. It is sad that America must step up and be the policeman of the world, but who else is going to do it.

2007-01-25 04:47:22 · answer #5 · answered by Marilyn M 3 · 2 4

Not at ALL.

He's so quick to send more troops into a war that we are LOSING. But hey, he feels secure...he's rich and his ugly daughters aren't in the military.

I could say SO much more here, but honestly? I'm over it.

2007-01-25 04:49:28 · answer #6 · answered by Megan V 4 · 2 2

The troops, not Bush and the Republicans.

2007-01-25 04:40:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Absolutely. I give my support for the President in a time when he needs it most.

I may not agree with his war plans, but I certainly agree with his cause.

2007-01-25 04:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 4 5

Not on everything but I do respect him unlike those who just spews & bashes against him and they don't do nothing else except blow their hot air around and foam at the mouth at the President.

Just goes to show that you can disagree with someone and still respect their position and rank ,it shows that you have good and better morals about yourself.

2007-01-25 04:46:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Nope. Didn't vote for him either time. The only time I was behind him was when we went to Afghanistan. That didn't last long because we obviously didn't send enough troops.

2007-01-25 04:41:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

fedest.com, questions and answers