2007-01-25 04:29:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't know, I will move to canada.....
2007-01-25 04:32:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No clue.
But here is a scary thing to ponder over......the book of Revelations in the Bible speaks of a unknown woman riding the beast. Well most realize the beast mentioned is the USA. So a woman riding the USA....hmmm....a woman president?
If she wins.....non Bible believers better start waking up. As that point most of Revelations will be fulfilled.
And another point....we have no laws to deal with a female president. Since Bill will be the "first man" we have no rules/laws for that either. From what I have heard...Hillary could actually hand over her title to Bill and since he was not elected into office, he has no length of term....aka a dictatorship.
Don't believe in Republicans or Democrats as they work for the same side. Clinton and George H.W. Bush are best buddies....and President Bush is cousins with John Kerry. Then all 4 of them are Skull and Bones members.
2007-01-25 04:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Exactly like a few people above me said. The Middle East was pretty screwed up before Bush was born (and by Bush, I mean Bush Sr!).
If Hillary is elected, it will be worse because we'll disappear from the Middle East, Israel will be nuked by Iran, and Ahmahoozawhatta from Iran will have a controlling stake in Iraq.
Not good.
2007-01-25 04:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Obama could be a plenty greater desirable ideal selection than Hillary. we ought to desire to now no longer enable the Clintons returned in workplace. this could be a extensive mistake! Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the journey, indoors the army or intelligence sectors of our government to attain a time as rapidly as we are battling a conflict oversees and attaining a broader “conflict” on terrorism. in many situations, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many stable Presidents, without extreme military credentials –– her husband being one in each of them. even nevertheless, with the purpose to rectify the quagmire that Bush has have been given us in, and additionally to redirect the “conflict on Terrorism” greater desirable effectively, and lots off from this Cowboy/Rambo attitude employed by skill of utilising Bush and his Henchmen, demands somebody of the two military or strategic competence. Hillary could be stable at baking chocolate chip cookies... yet ideal now we want somebody who demonstrates mastery of the two military techniques and remote places places worldwide family.
2016-11-27 01:20:07 · answer #4 · answered by jarvie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Middle East is the anus of the world because it is full of ignorance and centuries-old hate. If one looks at how the average woman (except in Kurdish society) is treated, there is no reason to believe that Hillary will fare any better.
2007-01-25 04:38:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
short answer? no, it won't. it'll be worse. we'll have literal WWIII
on our hands. and let me correct you. it's not Bush's policies that are ruining the Middle East. it's the radical islamists that are ruining the Middle East. the Libs don't help either, with their total blindness, ignorance, and disregard of the American people. they think they're looking out for our interests, but they just make things worse. just because a Rep. decided to finally do something about world terror, they are against it. we ignored this problem for way to long. many presidents ago this problem started and every one of them, including Rep., put this issue on the back burner. i, for one, am proud we have a Pres that's actually doing what he believes is right and not what others tell him what he should do blindly.
2007-01-25 04:41:22 · answer #6 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How do you know the Middle East is being ultimately ruined? Only time will tell us that. Hillary will make everything she touches turn to dust! do some background checks on this woman, please.
2007-01-25 06:00:11 · answer #7 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Billary Clinton is nothing but an aging, Blond Lush of a spineless jellyfish with a Law degree and appetite for MONEY and POWER!!!
I honestly cannot believe the people of this Country would get SOOOO bent out of shape about the Enron scandal, and then turn a blind eye to the real life, yes , IT HONESTLY HAPPENED BY GOD, PARDONING of MARK RICH!!!!!!
Folks, we are only talking about the FBI's MOST WANTED CORPORATE CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is you all INSANE? ----Or just Partisan TRASH!?
2007-01-25 04:37:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your question assumes the middle east wasn't already ruined.
You might want to read some history.
2007-01-25 04:32:59 · answer #9 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
you've got it wrong. the MIDDLE EAST is ruining the middle east.
they will continue to do so until they enjoy life enough to not want to kill their own children.
or as Golda Meir put it: there can be no peace until they love their children more than they hate us.
2007-01-25 04:34:48 · answer #10 · answered by political junkie 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You should have your mouth washed out with soap. The middle east had trouble way before Bush was born.
2007-01-25 04:33:00 · answer #11 · answered by swamp elf 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋