In my opinion nothing is worse for children than seeing their country's reputation destroyed because it started an unprovoked war of aggression based on lies. That is worse than oral sex any day.
2007-01-25 03:47:45 · 7 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
straightup - could you mention one of those other, "good" reasons to launch an unprovoked war of aggression against Iraq?
2007-01-25 04:23:04 · update #1
tcb - the UN declared a ceasefire between Iraq and its opponents in the Gulf War. That ceasefire was never lifted. The UN never approved the war, which is why it was illegal.
2007-01-25 04:43:37 · update #2
Now Freaky you know Republicans don't engage in oral sex. They only have sex for the purpose of procreation, in the missionary position with the lights off.
How could they possibly explain something to their children that they don't understand? Now war, death and senseless carnage, that's something they can really sink their teeth into.
2007-01-25 04:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by Sun Spot 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Depends on whether the child has good parents or not. It is much easier to make the war appear appropriate than a BJ and rape claims. There are many reason why the U.S. could have begun a war in Iraq, it just happens that the one that was emphasized was the incorrect one. Not that I'm for the war, but when a President lies under oath I think that's pretty bad (it wasn't just the BJ). Bush didn't lie, but was misled, just as the rest of Congress who voted for the war, they just have different ideas about getting it done.
2007-01-25 12:18:27 · answer #2 · answered by straightup 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Children don't see a country's reputation and worry about it.
Parents have to worry about trying to explain oral sex to a 7 year old.
Just for the record, Clinton's problem wasn't the sex but the cover up. He lied. He was impeached.
2007-01-25 11:59:59 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
there is a bonafide reason for this war and I do not understand why some of you "don't get it". When Hussein defied the UN resolution, we gave him a timetable w/ the results if he did not comply. He didn't, ergo war! The Iraqii people, oppressed for so long, deserve the freedoms we have. If you cannot "get this", something is really wrong with you!
2007-01-25 12:26:06 · answer #4 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I still find it completely freaking crazy that people hate Clinton so much, that they think Bush's lies about Iraq are no big deal. It doesn't bother these people at all that 3000 U.S. troops are dead and tens if not hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens are dead, and that these people would be alive if Bush hadn't lied. I'm willing to bet these same people will tell you they are moral Christians and I would like to know what is moral or Christian about that.
2007-01-25 12:17:17 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What I see here is the liberal spin on the truth. 'Bush's War' goes so much deeper than the liberal mind can comprehend. Fighting for freedom, justice and democracy is a very noble thing. And I just keep wondering why Clinton himself said Saddam had WMD. And many other Democrats said the same thing. They uttered phrases like 'He Must Be Stopped.' They must have been 'lying' too.
2007-01-25 12:04:06 · answer #6 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
in my opinion it would be clinton's escapades.
the war will teach that,we as a Nation,will protect ourselves and our great country's interests-whereas clinton's escapades will teach that is is ok to cheat on your wife and lie to the country you have vowed to serve.
hope that clears things up for you.
2007-01-25 12:11:45 · answer #7 · answered by slabsidebass 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋