English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

Not the government. The parents, the teenagers, and the general public should reject all of this loose living. Kids having kids. Girls bragging about how many different guys they've had.
When the teenagers themselves realize that they're in for a lifetime of misery and poverty, in exchange for a bit of fun and popularity in the present, things might get back to where marriage and family was something to look forward to.
No sex before marriage. And no marriage until each is sure of the other. When a young guy fathers kids, but has no, or a nothing job, he, the kids, and the mother are all in for a miserable life.
Plans and promises of a big job don't go very far. Have the good job with an excellent future, then have the kids.
It's all up to the girls. At one time girls were up on a pedestal., now they're down in the dirt.

2007-01-25 03:37:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The government needs to keep their damn noses out of the parents business. As far as how much freedom teens get, that is up to the teen. If someone show a lot of maturity and responsibility, then by all means, give them some freedoms. If they are the complete opposite-then don't. Personally I think some kids have way too much freedom for their age, and the parents need to have their collective asses kicked up on to their shoulders. Parents are trying to be their kids friend and letting them get away with too much. Start being a parent and be their friends when they are all grown up and don't need to be raised anymore.

2007-01-25 15:00:08 · answer #2 · answered by HiTekRednek 3 · 0 0

Teenagers are influenced by the advertisements, cinemas etc it has nothing to do with the Government. Govt only says that u should control birth and use condomns for avoiding aids, but it does not speaks about sex and control. It is the duty of the parents only to see whether the child is coming directly from the college, jobs etc or not.

2007-01-29 07:19:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Giving freedom is a good sign, but it should be check by the parants not by government, the family member even check it because this is a family issue first then social issue, so there should be no any role of Govt. it should be check by the parants that how they use the freedom. (to West it with some bogus Friends or to get some better opportunities)

2007-01-27 02:39:25 · answer #4 · answered by Krishna_B 2 · 0 0

1'st of all v r not given a lot of freedom
it is stressful for us due to studies and tutions....of course some teenagers do get out of control...but thats only b cuz they were not diciplined earlier in their lives
so no i dont think that teenagers r given much freedom nd dat the govt will make matters worst as teenagers usually break rulz when they r tried 2 b controlled the hard way!

2007-01-26 05:33:52 · answer #5 · answered by Kri 2 · 0 0

WE ARE SORRY THAT YOU HAVE STATED THAT THE TEENAGERS ARE GIVEN MORE FREEDOM. IT IS WRONG BECAUSE WE ARE NOT GIVING FREEDOM THEY ARE TAKING THE FREEDOM.
SOME CHILDREN BEHAVE VERY GOOD AT HOME BUT THEY WILL BE SO UNNATURAL AND LOUSY WHEN THEY ARE IN A GROUP OR ALONE. YES GOVERNMENT HAS TO TAKE SOME THING SPECIAL TO CURB THE PROBLEM OF BULLYING,RAGGING AND TEASING BY SOCIAL POLICING


BABUJI

2007-01-25 11:49:35 · answer #6 · answered by babuji 2 · 0 0

The government already tries to control every aspect of our lives, you want them to start controlling teenage freedom??? WHAT!!!! How are they given to much freedom? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question...

2007-01-25 12:01:20 · answer #7 · answered by Red 2 · 1 0

honestly think that it depends on the maturety of the teenager. me and my brother had freedom all our lives never a bed time, never grounded, never curfew. but i turned out with a god when i turned 16, a car and licenece, and payed it all. My brother was on probation from the age 14-17 .. been in and outta lock up all hi life, he's on drugs now... i think it depends on the maturety of that teenager

2007-01-25 14:02:31 · answer #8 · answered by Amanda 3 · 0 0

I think that the government has no say in this issue. It is the parents obligation to limit their freedoms and take care of their children.

2007-01-25 11:18:57 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Mizz Al-Abbady♥ 5 · 1 0

Checked by the government.

2007-01-25 13:22:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers