2007-01-25 02:02:47 · 27 answers · asked by Miss LaStrange 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Having a female president of America would be Brilliant, but i don't think it should be Hillary Clinton. She is not to be trusted.
If she does get in, will she removed the troops from Iraq? I doubt it. Will she rebuild ties with Europe again? Me thinks not.
Will she restore the good name of America, and make it an admired nation once more, i don't think so. Will she clean up George W Bush's Mess? I doubt it.
2007-01-25 04:11:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't know about Hillary in particular - i really don't know anything about her record in NY as i don't live in that part of the country - but i do think that a woman at the helm could be just what we need. It is much more probable that a woman president would actually think more than twice before entering into a war, let alone before starting one. also, a woman president would actually have a much better idea of what it takes to raise well mannered, well educated, well balanced children and would work towards those goals instead of trying to cut back education funding every time a new pork barrel project gets dumped on her desk.
2007-01-25 10:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by SmartAleck 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I'm not really into politics, but i study it from a neutral perspective. If i had to choose from Obama and Clinton, i'd choose Obama simply because i think he's pretty cool.
2007-01-25 10:07:59 · answer #3 · answered by philupthetank86 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not really into the political stuff but I honestly think she would kick some butt. And if and when she runs for president...( and she will ) I'll vote for her. I think men have run this country for to long now and it needs a womans touch.
2007-01-25 10:09:46 · answer #4 · answered by CLM 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes! I would definitely vote for her! She has done so much for womens rights and I think that she would be a strong president, and a great canidate for the country first woman president.
I am a man by the way!
2007-01-25 10:12:27 · answer #5 · answered by Shmesh 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That depends on the qualification of good.
Good for the democratic party, yes, it's win win for them. If she does great it makes the party look better especially after the boob of a republican she'd follow. and if she does bad they have the ability to say that it was too early for a female president..
Good for the people? well, it really doesn't matter who is president. All presidents have always voted as they were told by thier party. So in reality you aren't voting for a president, you are voting for one of two parties to run our government.
http://www.garageaction.com
2007-01-25 10:08:26 · answer #6 · answered by mitch stein 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She will turn this country into Commie Goose Steppers.
So would all the rest of the Democrat Candidates.
She is less of a hypocrite than the rest of them.
2007-01-25 10:07:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It depends.
If she has a Republican congress to restrain her like her hubby did, then maybe.
But I dread the fact that her socialized health care plan may come to pass.
Overall, probably not.
2007-01-25 10:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. No more Clintons and no more Bushes.
2007-01-25 10:06:19 · answer #9 · answered by Steve H 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
better than bush, but not much better.
that said, i'd vote for her. least objectionable canidate. but all politicians are liars. so it doesn't matter.
2007-01-26 12:59:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋