Whom? Why?
I take C. Rice as a puppet, just like W. Bush.
Sending, to Iraq, more soldiers (which are not their sons), they think they will decrease violence out there. That's stupidity because only the "presence of the 'westerns'" on the county makes them be against us and then makes more violence.
To stop violence with violence is, intrinsically and in itself, stupid. Think on it and then you'll see it.
Anyway, my question has nothing to do with it!
That's only my opinion.
Ie
Ie
2007-01-25 01:13:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hillary gets my vote over Rice any day.
My worst nightmare would be President Rice would appoint bush as here secretary of state!
2007-01-31 05:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by james l 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hilary for sure. Anyone who would vote for "Conda sleeza" doesn't have even half a brain. This woman is under qualified to even have the job she has now, the only reason she has it is because of her close ties to the Bush family. A perfect example was when fighting had broke out between Israel and Lebanon, Bush sent her over there to try and intervene, she did absolutely NOTHING. She was a failure just like every time she tries to get involved diplomatically. Every time the media asks her a question it is, "I don't recall" or "no comment." That's just because she is too crooked to tell you the truth about whats really going on. If you want this country to be in even worse shape than it is now, go ahead and vote for this idiot.
2007-01-25 09:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by Brian J 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Hilary, though I didn't care for her hubby his morales were all wrong. Rice is just a puppet like everyone else said she's too deep in with Bush
2007-01-30 09:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only political experience that Rice has is that of being a boot licker and a pathological liar. There are good odds that she would be even worse than Bush.
2007-01-25 09:21:11 · answer #4 · answered by Peter Pumpkin Eater 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't vote for either as they are both tainted by big money and special interest groups, as are any presidential candidates put forth by the two parties.
Gender and race have nothing to do with it.
Neither one stands a snowball's chance, however, unless both parties put them on the top of their respective tickets.
2007-01-25 09:33:24 · answer #5 · answered by normanbormann 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary all the way because Candy Rice is
Bush's Girl.
Like father like daughter.
2007-01-25 09:23:34 · answer #6 · answered by popo dean 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hilary, rice spent too much time is russia(or the soviet union, whatever you want to call it they just iced the cake differently)!
2007-01-25 09:29:16 · answer #7 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Rice is better - - no contest.
Rice is smarter.
Rice has values and principles.
Rice has proven abilities to work with other people.
Rice has a clean record - - no scandals. no political enemies.
Hillary has been involved in commodities scandals, real estate scandals, travel office scandals, tax return cheating, etc. etc. and sends the IRS upon her enemies.
Hillary voted for the war effort and supported it for years before reading an opinion poll.
Hillary maintains a long list of political enemies.
Hillary is only interested in promoting things to benefit herself.
Hillary curses like a drunken sailor.
2007-01-25 09:26:55 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Rice. She has more executive experience then Clinton and she is a self-made woman, not Clinton who road on the coat tails of her husband.
Don't think she is a puppet of Bush because she agrees with him. That is ignorant... but, I expect no less from liberals.
2007-01-25 09:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋
Hilary, smart, a woman, elegant, she got what it takes,
2007-01-25 09:19:03 · answer #10 · answered by RED ROSE 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋