It'd be fitting, really. With Hillary expected to win in '08, we can expect another Bush in '16. Even if it's a near tie. The Court will favor one family or the other from now on.
I call it appointment by "Caesarian Selection".
2007-01-25 00:58:12 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Crud. I noticed I'd misspelled Caesar on the question line so I changed it. But when I submitted it, it came up wrong anyway. Computers hate me.
As for the arguments of one over the other, we must view them as beltway buddies. Bush senior and Bill have become bosom buddies and there's probably a lot more closeness than we're let to see.
Keeping the people divided by strongly siding against one and for the other guarantees the dynastic agenda.
There's a petition to demand all third party candidates with at least 3% of the projected vote be included in presidential debates.
Personally, I favor an amendment that would allow the people to override the congress and pres with and 80% vote.
Sure it'd be majority rule, but there are ways to word the amendment that would ensure consideration of minority needs.
Besides, I'm beginning to think anything would be better than what we're turning into.
qwerty
2007-01-25 06:31:09 · update #1
Why not legislate that all candidates by called Kaiser and be done with it?
You could call it, wait for it...
The Kaiser Bill!
2007-01-25 01:05:56 · answer #1 · answered by Morgy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know Mr. Clinton DID NOT put us in a war, while he was in office, He opened more jobs for people, opened Friendly relations with other countries, his only MISTAKE, was getting a little on the side. Hell PEOPLE how many of you can say you haven't?
How many presidents have had affairs while they were in office? They just didn't get caught.
Bush put us in a war, because of Saddam NOT Bin Laden. If we were after Binny boy we would have already had him, and this thing would be over.
People forget Bin Laden ORDERED the strike against America, when was the last time his name has been brought up?
2007-01-25 09:20:07 · answer #2 · answered by spiritwalker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clintons are first generation in power, Bush family has a dynasty going back several generations!
Maybe Hillary will get elected twice, then it will be Chelsea's turn!
2007-01-25 09:07:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋