Im no great fan of unions, i think they are a bolshi bunch. people go on strike for trivial reasons and dont give a toss about the havoc they cause to jo public.
however we do need rights for employees so im not totaly against. BA are just particularly bad, lazy gits just want a couple of days off!
2007-01-25 00:42:43 · 11 answers · asked by spacegoblin 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
That's the Unions for you. I remember when they were riding high during the 60's 70's and early 80's, creating endless strikes across the board, and ruining British industry as well. And still people criticise Maggie Thatcher. They obviously don't remember freezing to death during the power strikes, and not being able to bury the dead, amongst many other things. It always seems that we have to keep learning the same lessons over and over again. I suppose its the younger generations who have no memory of these things, and nobody bothers to tell them. Employees have too many right's these days. With the help of the 'Human Right's Act, more than the employers it would seem.
'Dolly Bird' criticises the questioner, without explaining why. Just a mindless ranter, probably from a generation who doesn't remember the appalling abuse of power during the periods I have referred to above.
2007-01-25 02:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by Veritas 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i actually examine the alternative and the regulation in question, or maybe if the alternative became in accordance to a technicality, the choose made the right call. The union administration is needed through regulation to grant particular preparation in a particular way and did not income this. hence a strike can't be qualified. If the union addresses the priority, there'll be no longer some thing battling destiny strikes. From what i am going to tell, its an elementary fix, that is only yet another count number number the position the regulation has no longer stuck up with technologies. the entire factor is that regulation has no longer some thing to do with the underlying theory, a choose ought to implement the statute as written.
2016-10-16 02:12:23 · answer #2 · answered by shoe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have worked for B A and can sympathise with the cabin crew,
B A's management are ignorant, arrogant and do not listen to anything but their own selfish interests. They are paranoid and domineering and do not give a flying (sic) f*ck about the workforce.
They have brought this on themselves by their ignorant indifference to any sort of grievance, no matter how justified it may be.
2007-01-25 03:31:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah i believe they are being selfish. If their job is that crap why don't they find alternative employment and give someone else the chance?
It's all me me me in this country.
2007-01-25 02:51:55 · answer #4 · answered by bluenose 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's BA? Bad attitude?
2007-01-25 01:16:33 · answer #5 · answered by JoAnn W 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Be nice to have a job to strike from. They are ungrateful expletives.
2007-01-25 00:47:54 · answer #6 · answered by Del Piero 10 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
they just want some more days off out of it but what theyre complaining about is probably nothing
2007-01-25 04:18:51 · answer #7 · answered by liam0_m 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are just lazy gits
2007-01-25 00:50:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
the asker of this question is a complete idiot with no understanding of the issues involved just another brainless clown who thinks he knows it all,,, what a wa+*er....
this question has attracted a bunch of small minded morons
2007-01-25 00:56:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
When you realise what their gripe is ..YES.
They want extra time off for cold-sores,colds etc...diddums, would'nt we all?
Bring back Maggie Thatcher, she'd soon cure these lefty gets.
2007-01-25 00:55:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋