Is Yahoo's featuring of Hillary proof the media is liberal?

Question

They obviously wanted to help get Hillary's message out so they featured her. I'd be damned if they ever featured George Bush.

Answer 1

Hillary has rights too Neocon

Answer 2

As I have said, "a Clinton/Edwards win will give Democrats 8 years in control of the White House, they will need far more time than that to fix all the harm done to America by the Republicans.
That said check the polls, Hillary beats all by far. As to Yahoo, they know Hillary has the power and money to win, I would also back a winner not a loser like any Republicans or GW Bush. It's about Money and power. Hillary has both.

Answer 3

I don't mind the fact that most media commentators are pretty far to the left. I wish they'd admit this but I don't mind that it's true. Some commentators are pretty far to the right. Most admit it (e.g., Limbaugh).

What I mind is misrepresentation of the facts. A political position is a set of values applied to a set of facts. We can agree on what the facts are and still reach different conclusions because we apply different values to those facts. That's fine. But a lot of people just operate with their own set of facts. If you're not happy with 4.4% unemployment, you don't have to be, but why do people on the Left insist that the unemployment number doesn't include people whose benefits ran out? The BLS calculates unemployment and they say their calculation has nothing to do with benefits - if you're not going to believe the BLS on how the BLS calculates the unemployment number, why debate, you're just going to make up whatever facts fit the conclusion you want to reach, and anyone familiar with the facts will see that that's what you're doing.

Answer 4

Have you ever watched Fox News???? Of COURSE the media is political...each side having their own puppets in place. While they used to claim to be objective, I think the media in the US has followed suit with the public, all but claiming their political leanings.

I'm not a cynical person by nature, but I'm having a very hard time believing any news media and feeling that I am getting the 'real' story. For that reason, I have started watching BBC - at least they are not trying to hide their biases, and their newscasters are 'real' - as opposed to the Barbie and Ken approach in North America...

Answer 5

i became in intense college for the period of Eisenhowers 2d term. i will attest to the days of limited Media, and with reference to information, reporting became investigative, and in many circumstances substantiated as genuine, or it became presented as preliminary and unsubstantiated. Broadcast remark for the period of a information software became presented as a sidebar, with the assertion this remark isn't inevitably the area of the community or the Station administration. Todays Media, with reference to information, and particularly with reference to Politics, is as lots remark as reality. Newspapers as quickly as reported reality, and reporters respected reality; remark became reserved for the Editorial internet site. Todays Media is entertainment, information does not sell, till this is a automobile chase or shootout, or a disaster interior the making. I hear to the source, I evaluate according to adventure, and that i'm biased.

Answer 6

Yes. That is the exact thing I was thinking!
And Hillary's a liar, just like her husband.

Answer 7

I guess you didn't read the disclaimer:

"Yahoo! Answers Staff note: Yahoo! Answers is a forum for people from all over the world to engage with one another and to find information on topics that interest them. This is not an endorsement. We are not siding with any candidate or party -- in general or for the 2008 US elections. We’re hopeful that people from all perspectives will realize the great insights that the Answers community can have, and will turn to us for future discussions."

As far as the President asking a question on here, he's free to, but I don't see him as the kind of person who would do that. He probably doesn't even know Yahoo! Answers exists.

Answer 8

Yes it is. How come no one is remarking on the fact that Hillary is being paid $8 million to write a book on her memoirs but during the Whitewater Investigation she couldn't remember a blessed thing? She couldn't even remember that she stored all of the Whitewater files in the basement of the White House. Is that what they want for President? How sad.

Answer 9

Every time I see her ugly face on here I could puke.
Yahoo is liberal and won't let me post some of my questions that are much less inflammatory than the libs post.

Answer 10

My guess is that yahoo would be pleased to feature any serious questions from wide range of government leaders. Call your conservative Reps and tell them to put up a question!

Answer 11

I answered her and told her that she failed on healthcare under her husband when she tried to push socialized medicine.

Also, it should be pretty clear to Americans that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!

Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:

-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud

We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!

Please, we need a change!!!
.
.