who is right about the issue of gay adoption ? the british government or the Catholic Church.
2007-01-25 00:18:01 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
for people who quoted from the bible , in GENESIS 9:3 Everything that lives and moves will be food for you . Just as I gave you the green plants , I now give you everything. After reading this , do you still object to people eating dogs and cats in Korea and China. Sometimes you just cannot pick and choose when it comes to the bible, either you totally accepted it or totally rejected it .
2007-01-25 01:39:23 · update #1
The problem is that the church thinks it’s above the law and above British democracy. I don’t think the Catholic Church should have any involvement in adoptions, they don’t exactly have a very good record when it comes to kids do they.
2007-01-25 13:04:57 · answer #1 · answered by pissed off with abuse, goodbye! 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The problem is that half our Parliament is made up of gay and sexually corrupt MP's without the British public checking their status. On top of that our television companies are also managed by a proportionate similar number of gays. We the normal people have simply let it get out of hand. Letting gay couples have our children even when the natural parents of the children to be adopted say no is simply a means of telling the British public that they have the power to crush any opposition. The BNP and UKIP are our only hope of beating this scandalous abuse of power but with the national television and press reporting so much propaganda both parties are on a uphill struggle. The catholic and Protestant religions are to be supported on this issue and it is another indication that New Labour has lost the plot.
Over twenty percent of the Conservative candidates are to be gay at the next election by order of Cameron. Surely even the strongest supporters of New Labour and Conservative must see there is a real problem in our society that needs addressing now!
2007-01-25 00:50:59 · answer #2 · answered by Redmonk 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Fundamentally, this is not a question about the rights of homosexual couples to adopt children, nor about the views of the Roman Catholic Church on the rights of homosexuals.
Rather, It is about the extent to which any religion can be exempt from human, state law. What is the relationship between church and state in 2007? We will soon find out.
2007-01-25 02:01:38 · answer #3 · answered by Faceless 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Time are changing, and you should get used to it. If you're not comfortable with something that's happening then ask yourself why that is - do you *really* think homosexuality is immoral, or do you simply fear that which you don't understand?
The way in which you or I live is not 'normal' - there is no such thing. The lack of discrimination means more options for people to live the way they want to live, and you need to get used to it. There's no sense offering the olive branch of freedom from discrimination if you don't actually want people to use it.
2007-01-25 03:07:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, I answered a question yesterday which implied that it would be better for a kid to be adopted by gays than to be aborted, and that in fact it was somehow hypocritical to oppose both abortion and gay adoption:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmyRObDr_zT.DJGpmSQ6OUfsy6IX?qid=20070124080938AAWhUOH&show=7#profile-info-AA11110527
If that's true, and the welfare of the child is paramount, then wouldn't it be better to allow the Church to place children in SOME homes than to force the church out of the business of placement altogether?
What would be best for the children? Do we force the children to suffer to make a political point?
VERY interesting question!
2007-01-25 01:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I thought the Church of England was supporting the Catholic Church on this one?
The church is right.
2007-01-25 00:40:58 · answer #6 · answered by Yak Rider 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
it is common knowledge that if a child is raised in a home where there is violence, drugs, alcohol, etc chances are the child will follow suite , so how can anyone say that homosexuals should be allowed to adopt kids unless they are homos themselves and want this kind of indecent or sick exposure to be to the adopted kids, and no one can say homos don't want as many homos in their ranks as possible, and they will try their best to influence the kids and tell them it is perfectly normal, I don;t think they should have the right to adopt children nor to have civil right such as marriage nor any other what they proudly display as gay rights, they missed the boat when these miserable BAS,,,,, claim to be gay,
2007-01-25 00:53:54 · answer #7 · answered by james w 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The world is going mad. To allow people with sexual perversions or who are freaks of nature to adopt vulnerable children is definitely a step in the wrong direction. The government is supposed to be setting high standards. Or am I mistaken?
2007-01-25 05:41:09 · answer #8 · answered by frank S 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There are alot of children who have been abused that need to be adopted. The issue of adopters being gay does not mean that the child won't go to a good home. As long as the child is being cared for, loved and given stability, then should that not be the main priority? Who is to say that gay couples cannot provide this?
2007-01-25 00:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by Danru 4 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I don't know why people are having a BIG DEAL about Gays and the adoptions. Also i think if people have different believes on the bible and such let them. that's their choice.
Everyone has their own believes on religous wise. it doesn't bother me, as long as they don't go judge me for my believes.
2007-01-25 05:00:30 · answer #10 · answered by Nascar Momma 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋