BECAUSE SHE WILL TAKE AWAY MY GUNS. NOOOO!
THESE ARE MY GUUUNNNS!
2007-01-25 00:25:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well...... Lets consider that the Clinton's ARE liars...... and I'm certainly NOT voting for this Clinton package of lies!
Hillary has high negative ratings. There are a lot of people that REALLY dislike her these are a few of the reasons:
-- Hillary is the liberal media's sweetheart, but not America's sweatheart
-- The Clintons LIE and her husband was impeached for lying and committing purjury
-- Her failed healthcare program under her husband
-- Her shrieking voice that grates on people
-- She doesn't look presidential
-- She is very liberal even more than her husband, but bends (lies) politically to pick up votes and reverts back. This is called a "phony."
-- This would bring her husband back into politics and many people do not like that idea.
-- Her husband also has high negative approval ratings.
-- White Water fraud
We've had almost twenty years of the clinton-bush dynasty. Aren't we ready for a freakin break? If we vote in the shrieking b-i-t-c-h, the dynasty could go to almost THIRTY years. Then Jeb Bush could add another eight years??!
Please, we need a change!!!
.
.
2007-01-25 00:16:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by charles 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why don't you ask her home state. She puts up a good front now but when she was in her old job ( land deals ) the people that worked in the office with her said she has a mouth on her like a sailor. Also what about the missing documents that were missing for 12 mo then suddenly appeared. If that's the person you want to run the country please wait till I'm gone. Don't put all of your trust in to the media they tend to be one sided on most issues and that is a shame because news should be straight up nothing but the facts, then you make up your own mind based on the facts reported, not on the facts as they are presented to us after the have been realigned to fit the owners agenda. Also if the Clinton's had their way we would be one nation under UN law !
2007-01-25 01:00:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ULTRA150 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
She's a corporate sellout that wants nothing but oligarchy, why vote for someone who is "actually" more closer to the right then everyone thinks if you look at record with gay marriage, civil rights, economic policy, voting for the Iraq war, Christ, is it not obvious enough with the right leaning corporate media we have, NOT A LIBERAL MEDIA what so ever dominant in the establishment TARDS. Think.
2015-11-30 17:27:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Liam Irwin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Has too much baggage. Do a Yahoo Search
on Bill and Hillary Clinton and it'll have more
information on her and Bill!!!!!!
2007-01-25 00:18:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
She is way too liberal. Her political views are far to the left of mainstream America.
I am a conservative and don't want government mucking things up, like health insurance.
2007-01-25 00:20:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I disagree with her thoughts and theory of government. This is why she should not be president.
2007-01-25 00:22:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by c1523456 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
While not necessarily defending Hillary Clinton, I do want to point out a few things which occurred to me as I read some of the answers above mine.
To Charles who said "The Clintons are liars"- we know Bill is, he was impeached for perjury over Monica. All Hillary ever said about this was, she didnt know what was going on and of course, she wouldn't know, it was an affair. So how is she a liar? Has she told a lie on the scale of, for example, "We will smoke [Osama bin Laden] out of his hole"?
"Her failed Health care program"- She was First Lady, Charles with NO political authority. And everytime she brought the concept of Nationwide Healthcare up, the Republicans screamed "Socialism!!"
Rep Gov Schwarzennegger has announced plans to have Universal healthcare in CA, to even include children of illegal aliens. Why don't Reps scream socialism now?
"Her shrieking voice"? "Doesnt look Presidential?" Shame on you Charles. How uneducated does Bush sound when he tries to throw some Middle East name out at a speech, how slow did he sound trying to recite the old platitude about "Fool Me Once Shame on You, Fool me Twice, Shame on Me"? He couldn't finish it correctly and resorted to, "Fool me once, shame on... uhh you... fool me twice.... uhh umm... see, you can't get fooled again."
Did you know Republican Presidential candidate and war veteran John McCain fathered an illegitimate black child and raises that child RIGHT NOW as his own? No? That's because the charge is NOT TRUE. His son is legally adopted, with neither his nor Ms McCain's genes, but the Bush campaign still implied that very thing to religious voters in the South Carolina primary in 2000. The charges regarding Whitewater aren't true either, with no convictions of ANYONE involved or investigated in this fruitless and fiscally wasteful REPUBLICAN investigation. A lot of implications but no real facts.
The one thing you say with anything approaching truth is the public's reluctance to allow Bill Clinton keys to the White House again, and although I thought he was a great President (being a bigger fan of oral sex than most Republicans, I guess), I don't think we need an UNEMPLOYED Bill Clinton running rampant in the White House, whike his extemely busy Wife is distracted running the country. Although the resulting endless investigations into Bills shenanigans will keep the Rups busy and happy while Hillary straightens out Bush's messes in the Middle East.
The point is, none of your other reasons make any sense at all. Everything you cite as a reason to NOT vote for Hillary is something your CURRENT President is WAY more guilty of.
"Hillary Lies?" Bush doesnt? Im so tired of spelling WMDs I'll just say, "nuclear weapons in Iraq"?
As I said, while I like Bill Clinton as a President, as "First Gentleman", he is in a position to wield influence (I balk at using the word "tremendous":in front of "influence" I think Hilary is enough of her own woman to not take ANYONE'S bullying, even Bill's) over the most Powerful Person in the World, and most people in the US dont like the thought of that.
5.5 years after the tragedy of Sept 11, 2001, a tragedy even Saddam Hussein expressed his sorrow and regret over (before turning his speech of sympathy into one of hate and intolerance), all that worldwide sympathy and now "terrorists" in GREECE are bombing our embassies, for crying out loud! What in hell did we do to these Greek "leftists?? Is this progress in the "War on Terror"? Am I gonna have to start calling it "Freedom Falafel"? Or refer to anal intercourse as "Bushing the Bachdoor"? Seems to me whatever policy Bush is following to fight (did anyone else notice he never says, "END the war on terror", it's always "FIGHT the war on terror"?) is not working, unless these policies are not designed to end the war, but to fight it forever and ever, by creating terrorists everywhere.
Is this going to be like the "War on Drugs"? Prisons filled with pot smokers, and more drugs on the streets than at any time in history? Is that what we've voted ourselves into? A culture of endless war and conflict?
These kinds of wars are great (for arms dealers). Since you never have to run out of either drugs or terrorists, the war just keeps going and going and going.... I had NO idea the Energizer Bunny was Republican!
Hilary's biggest liability is not her looks, how she sounds, her politics, her past, or her honesty. It's her husband. People will NOT allow Bill back into the White House and the Republicans would hand this country over to Canada before allowing that to happen.
She divorces Bill, she's got a legitimate shot at the Oval Office. Of course, the "family values" Republicans will whine about her getting a divorce too. I dont know why ANYONE wants alife in American Politics. No one involved in them seems very grown up or interested in actually SOLVING some of America's problems.
2007-01-25 01:09:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
VINCE FOSTER, CROOKED LAND DEALS, LYING, POWER MONGER TO STATE A FEW!
2007-01-25 00:17:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
2⤊
1⤋