D'u think this is the perfect solution for the problem President Bush is currently facing?

Question

Bush is pleading to send more troops to Iraq. if he doesn't get it, he could in future say US lost the war coz he didnt get support.

There must be at least 22k US families who still think Bush is the hero. After all, his faithful supporters voted for him. Not once, but TWICE!

SOLUTION: US should only send those pro war families to fight for Bush, in the name of peace (oh how ironic :-) and democracy (how noble it sounds). This means INCLUDING the kids of Bush +his loved ones. they'd be so proud?

Blair should also send his own kids to show he's 100% behind Bush, plus those violent prisoners who r living in overcrowded prisons. Wow, how perfect is that. They might want the chance to die for their own country in HONOUR.

If Bush is right, then Iraq will be in peace: free from terror?

If this works, everybody will be in Heaven? if not, they would die happy anyway for the love of their beliefs. The undertakers would be ecstatic too.

Is this a great idea? Pass it on.

If u r a Bush supporter, please explain why u do not want your own families to fight in the front line in Iraq?

For the Bush supporters who do send their loved ones to Iraq, u have made your point. If u read it properly, this posting is not trying to stop u from sending more of your loved ones, either as brave soldiers or human shields. It's your choice. Maybe u should let the Iraqis to decide if they wanted US liberation. u wouldn't want strangers barging into ur home n tell u what is best for u. Being abusive to the non supporters do not make u right.

Answer 1

Yes to sending our govt politicians' children over there;
no to sending our prisoners there (they would loot & steal & rape & the Iraqis don't deserve this, rather, make all prisons into factories and pay the prisoners 20p per hour + food & shelter for working in them) - think of all the scissors, paper cups & paperclips we could EXPORT.

As for the troop increase - reject it - if the current 20,000 troops can't control the place, then hand over the peacefuller half of provinces & half of the municipalities in the remainder and concentrate our efforts on assisting the police in the trouble spots alone - including giving free evacuations over the sunni-shia border.

Answer 2

i imagine that the perfect answer to this question got here quickly from what bill Clinton reported for the time of his first marketing campaign. "What ever one President does isn't obvious until eventually 6 to eight years after he's elected" saying that, each and every President suffers or reward from what the previous administration has achieved, so all those that are bashing Bush for 9/11 ought to heed properly the words of their HERO and also you should't extremely choose Bush's finished effect until eventually the subsequent President is in workplace. If issues are tremendous with the subsequent President, Bush became good, if issues Suck then so did Bush. those that are complaining about the price of gas are unaware that Al Gore bought off a huge area of our petroleum reserves to Occidental Petroleum, less than marketplace fee, now to not say that some thing became fishy (LOL) yet Al Gore Sr. worked for Occidental, damn I save forgetting this conflict is about OIL What militia, Clinton destroyed the militia, what number bases were closed less than the Clinton administration. how most of the terrorists that attacked US pastimes (united statesCole, embassies attacks on golf equipment the position Marines were generic to be) that bill Clinton PROMISED must be hunted down and punished were ever hunted down or punished. ZIP it is what number No liberal needs to take heed to that in 1995 the CIA discovered data that terrorists had planned to apply plane to damage the CIA progression, and in 1996 the CIA discovered data that the terrorists had planned to damage skyscrapers in large apple, all they listen is Bush received intelligence comments 2 weeks in the previous they executed their plan and receives the blame for no longer doing some thing. Bush receives 2 weeks, bill receives 4 years and does no longer some thing.

Answer 3

I love these rhetorical questions. First, our army is all-volunteer. If the troops have problems with the possibility of going to Iraq, they can seek a discharge on "conscientious objections". Second, Bush didn't receive more votes than Gore in 2000. He was put in office by the Supreme Court who shot down a Florida recount. I, for one, didn't vote for Bush, and never have voted for a Bush. But, I will defend our troops and the job they do wherever they serve. They serve their nation unselfishly and with honor. As for Blair, his child is a baby, isn't it? As for the war, it's up to the Iraqi government to handle their own affairs, end the sectarian violence between Islamic sects, and to establish their own army and police force. The US needs to get out. Getting rid of Saddam, his cronies has been done, no WMD were found, no 9-11 conspiracy was found. Our job is done. Time to come home.

Answer 4

There are 22K Soldiers and Marines chomping at the bit to get into Iraq. They're already trained, supplied and motivated to get the job done. It won't be easy, it never is. But the outcome is quite probably a victorious one for the Iraqi people. the USA, and those Coalition members with the fortitude to stick it out.
Will terrorism be defeated? Not likely. But the insurgents and terrorists lives will be much more difficult with Iraq in a position to defend it's new-found freedom. And more importantly, the people of the nations bordering Iraq will benefit from the prosperity that freedom will bring.
The President of the United States already has all the funds and authorization he needs to send those highly motivated young men and women into the fray.

Answer 5

The draft should be reinstated and every American should serve at least 2 years in the support of the Country. you should have to earn your right to the benefits of this country. If someone votes for a particular President then they should go to war for that President. OK Agreed - If the person you vote for wins the next election you can take the next seat on the plane to war.

Answer 6

Unfortunately whether only Bush supporter go off to war, It's still America's name that goes with them.

Answer 7

Good idea but it won't work. More troops, - less troops, - no troops, it does not matter much what we do. Only the Iraqi people can decide if they want a country or a battlefield.

Answer 8

I agree.
And furthermore, if there STILL aren't enough troops to support Bush's little war of choice, and we need to institute a draft, First we should look at those who drive those giant gas guzzling SUVs.
The rest of us should not have to suffer to support YOUR habit.

My car get 40 mpg so my brother-in-law can have a Hummer that gets 8? What purpose does that have but to compensate for smaller body parts?

Answer 9

A very valid question that brings to light the fact most of our leaders do not have family members at risk nor do they have the honor to fight for the cause.

The days of General George Washington, fighting on the front lines, are over.

I know ppl think questions like this are rhetorical but there is truth in what this question is saying no matter which side of the political spectrum you fall on.

Answer 10

Great idea, but sadly it will never happen.

If there was a law that stated whoever starts a war had to go and fight themselves (or someone in their family).. there would be no more wars ever.