Tell me, are you WWE, TNA, both or none ... why?

Answer 1

kenrayf kind of hit it for me. I appreciate both. WWE is more focused on storylines which I don't really need. The problem with their storylines is that they are either hit or miss. Some are really good like the Evolution storyline, Invasion, and the buildup on Batista. Other storylines are just dumb like the Chavo fueds as of late, ECW as a whole, and the return of DX. I also am more about in ring performance more than I am about mic skills or look. That is why my favorite wrestlers in the business are Kurt Angle, Chris Beniot, and Paul Burchill. Good gimicks can win me over but they have to have some in ring ability like Undertaker, Kane, Shawn Michaels, Booker T, Ken Kennedy, Edge, Orton, Samoa Joe, and Styles. But I don't like how the WWE pushes either a heel who deserves it or a face that the crowd just loves despite their skills. I mean come on, Batista, Lashley, and Cena? Give me a break.

The only thing that bugs me about TNA is that fact that most of their matches look like they have every second of it planned out. A lot of their matches look like bad scenes from a movie. Plus I havn't got used to, and don't think I will, the 6 sided ring. I think I would be ok with it if they just increased the area of the ring. It looks like it is about 50% the area of the standard ring. It really doesn't look good to me. So I would have to more twords WWE because they have more quality wrestlers, better gimicks and storylines. But I appreciate how TNA is more about wrestling than it is the storylines and I can see why some many people are jumping ships. The WWE to me just has a lot of better things with just a lot of bad things if that makes any sense.

Answer 2

I prefer TNA actually. Not that I'm not a fan of WWE, but at the end of the day I want to see good, exciting, unpredictable matches. The WWE just does not give that anymore. They are more focused on skits and rehashing old ideas and quality of the product has lessened quite a bit. TNA offers non-stop action from opening bell. Sure the WWE is a bigger company with more resources but bigger isn't always better. They were a small company at one point and probably had people saying the same things to down the company as some people are saying about TNA. TNA will become a major player if the fan base continues to grow as it has. We traditional wrestling fans appreciate the "less talk more action" approach of TNA over the 30 mins of talking and promotion each Monday on RAW. WWE caters too much to the "faces" on the programs and the matches have become dull and predictable because we always know who is going to win.

Answer 3

WWE, though TNA shows some good wrestling matches, the entire show doesn't do enough to keep my attention, I find myself trailing off to draw, or find something to eat, or work out, and that's sad dude to the fact that it's not even on that long. WWE usually keeps my attention all the way through, whethere I hate the segmant or love it, I have to see what is going to happen next.
I could care less what really happens in TNA, no matter what the outcomes in it, I have the same reaction, "oh well"

Answer 4

WWe because Tna can,t afford more fans then wwe and tna just bring some random person of the street and try too turn him into a tna superstar.

Answer 5

I'm both, since I enjoy a lot of wrestlers from both stables. I'm not really big on storylines. I'm more of an actual "in-ring" performance person and I appreciate the athleticism of the wrestlers, especially guys like Chris Benoit, London and Kendrick, RVD, Chavo Guerrero, Lashley, A.J. Styles, Fallen Angel, and Jay Lethal.

I also enjoy some of the characters the characters for their personas, such as Mr. Kennedy and Alpha Male.

Lastly, many of these guys make other guys look better than they really are. These include Triple H and Finlay.

Answer 6

WWE, though they have their slow moments, they are always the one to entertain me the most in the end, I watched TNA for a while, and I was bored through most of the shows

Answer 7

I watch TNA because I'm a huge fan of STING, I haven't watched WWE in a couple years as I got sick of watching the same matches every week.

Answer 8

a lot of people call me sad and say wresling is fake but i enjoy the sport and watch raw tna and smackdown and i used to watch ecw (used to for obvious reasons). raw has got decent storylines and is the only live show. tna has good storylines and wrestling and do a flippin' good job to fit it into 1 hour shows and the x division never cease to amaze me. smackdown has got good wrestling but the storylines need to get better because undertaker is always getting the same stuff but ending on a good point the cruiserweights speed is amazing. they arn't as extreme as the x division but the speed they move around the ring and do moves is like lightning.
i like both

Answer 9

wwe because they got way more superstars and diferent types of matches than Tna,and i don't watch Tna because they are stealing everything from wwe like the matches iron man,steel cage,last man standing,ect,i just hope they don't copy the royal rumble or elimination chamber.and by the way i also hate the six-side ring what the hell are they thinking?

Answer 10

WWE...It has better drama and action. It is really neat to watch. I know its all FAKE but TNA is soo boring and it is on really late at night and I can't watch it because I have to get up earlier. I like Kurt Angle on TNA. Thats the only thing I like about TNA.