Did anyone see the news report about Mr. Obama?

Question

Once he decided to run for President the "media" started to attack him trying to discredit him. I knew there would be something to try and make him lose. They are using his elementary school education of a couple of years in a PUBLIC school and saying that it's a radical muslim school. If it wasn't so desperate a measure to hurt his Presidential bid it would be funny! Mr. Obama will continue to be attacked, ridiculed and critisized left and right because he is a conceived threat of changing the history of having all caucasian Presidents in this country. The death threats will come soon if they haven't already started. It's time for a change and this country needs to accept that fact and let go of it's ethnic line barriers.

Answer 1

Yeah, I saw the report about Obama, and I knew right away it was a bold-faced lie. He was a very little boy when his parents sent him to the legitimate PUBLIC SCHOOL in Indonesia that was the alleged terrorist madrassa of the 'news' story. Good God almighty!

This 'news' story smells like the kind of thing that Republican Propaganda Master Carl Rove did to destroy the character and reputations of Democrats running against Dick Cheney's Handpuppet. They seem to revel in taking the lowest road possible--to try to ruin the reputation of the speaker without considering the merit of his or her message. The ancients called this, "Argumentum ad hominem"--attack the speaker, not the message.

I really would like to see an honorable political campaign run for a change. There hasn't been one for a very long time. Why hit below-the-belt? Why not examine the issues that each candidate supports?

Frankly, I don't believe a single bit of political hype from any political group anywhere in the entire world. All the spins put on things are entirely self-serving and don't deserve
any consideration whatsoever.

That's why it's so important in the world today TO STUDY ISSUES, GET ALL THE FACTS YOU CAN, and think things through before voting. Personally, I believe that the lilght of intellect shed on 'issues' is infinitely more important than the dim bulb of thoughtless emotional reactions when it comes to politics.

Don't let the mudslingers and hype wizards and thought-spinners overwhelm you or influence you when you enter the voting booth. The future is up to YOU. May whoever wins be WISE--Black or White, male or female--and not another knuckledragger.

Answer 2

All the would be presidential candidates are susceptible for all sorts of smear campaign to discredit them, regardless of their colour, faith, origin. Mr. Obama, I believe, understands that well. The most important thing is that if he is determine to go all the way he and his supporters should march on regardless and fight every corner of the battle till the end.

I am not sure, though, that Americans in general are ready and willing to accept black man in the White House, I might be wrong, and I wish I am wrong. They are less declined, though, to accept a woman at the top. Hillary Clinton, too, will be subjected to all kinds of dirty campaign, not only because she is Democrat, but also because she is a woman and, once, was the first lady of a very successful President.

Politics is a dirty game! Those who want to play it must be ready to get mad thrown unto them!

Personally, Obama would be my first choice and Clinton would be my second best. Neither, though, would change much of the USA foreign policy! It will be more or less of the same, in this regard. But, then I am not an American. Only the American people have the right to put it right!

And they have my BEST WISHES!

Answer 3

I don't believe it is "ethnic" barriers. Rather it has to do with faith. Mostly faith in Israel, and faith in the "new world order" (that is one world government). If you accept political correctness, and moral relativism, and evolutionism, that doesn't leave anything of substance to believe in, and people don't want to face the fact that we are bankrupt. Not only financially, but also morally.