2007-01-24 21:28:02 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Same and joined at the hip.
2007-01-25 00:44:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
They are both as bad as each other but bush is slightly worse if it wasn't for him trying to settle old scores on behalf of his father then the war that is happening at the moment would never have started. As for Blair he is just bushes lap dog who chose to support this madness after the rest of Europe failed to support bush. And for good reason as they are no further forward than when they started except for the fact that Saddam is dead ask what have they really achieved??
2007-01-25 05:50:57 · answer #2 · answered by cookie 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Blair is worse because he can't stand up to bush, even though most of the UK are against the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan
2007-01-25 05:33:12 · answer #3 · answered by gina 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they are as bad as each other . Bush with the support of the Congress and Blair with the support of the Parliament decided to invade Iraq without paying any regards to international laws. Democracy does has its drawbacks when cunning political leaders set out to manipulate their colleagues to jump into their bandwagons.eg , Blair said Iraqi missiles could reach British soil in 45 mins , Bush said we knew saddam got WMD and Saddam was behind 9/11.
2007-01-25 06:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blair because he does everything that Bush wants him to do without thinking what is best for Britain/England.
2007-01-25 05:43:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Blair or Bush? One is intelligent one is not yet they both do the same stupid things.
2007-02-01 19:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by rcj1rcj2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a question that none of us can really understand unless we are up there with them! World affairs allows politician's to see events that the 'man in the street' never takes into account because he is unaware of them! Bush has a huge task on his plate not just governing the U.S.A. But world affairs are staggering in there complexity! I know we all joke about him but the man is really under a terrible load! Blair not quite so much, but still daunting! Imagine you! suddenly waking up one morning, and you are the President! Have you any idea how many problems your assailed with before you have breakfast!? Troop deaths, calamities! floods! Snow! Iraq! Afghanistan! Terrorism! The list goes on! Frightening! isn't it?
2007-01-25 05:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by wheeliebin 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Apparently, Muslim women shaved their crotches in a recent protest, perhaps they took the "Hate Bush" idea too far.
With that in mind I think Blair is better, Muslim ladies, prefer him.
2007-01-25 05:38:50 · answer #8 · answered by vwcarman2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is 10 times worse than Blair.
His actions have a far more reaching effect on this planet.
2007-01-25 05:32:41 · answer #9 · answered by Yeti 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blair because he is intelligent and has done so much harm
George W can plead mitigation on the grounds of mental impairment.
2007-01-25 05:32:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i believe that Blair can ride a bike if that helps
2007-01-29 16:17:32 · answer #11 · answered by The Fat Controller 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋