Was America Fair enough to attack on iraq on basis of nuclear weapons?

Question

I just think that america had purposely attacked iraq because his eyes was on oil based in iraq

Answer 1

go back to your madras and learn some more english

Answer 2

Nuclear weapons was never an excuse used to justify the invasion of Iraq. The term was "weapons of mass destruction"--referring to chemical and biological weapons that we assumed they had because we SOLD THEM TO IRAQ in the 1980's during the Iran/Iraq war!

Answer 3

Oil is no big secret for anyone since we've been in Middle East for oil for long time. There have been push to remove Saddam since 1991 Iraq War. WMD should have not been the main reason for 2003 Iraq War. It was very weak case. Shouldn't surprise any one they had so many leaks aimed to criticize the administration and how numerous high ranking officials, intelligence officials resigned after whole WMD aftermass.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/truth/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/

Answer 4

if there were any nuclear weapon four years r enough to find it. and we stiil have not heard that usa find any mass destructive weapon in iraq. so it was not fair. if the had they wont b able to launch it from the back of the camel.

Answer 5

that also wasn't the only reason, but true enough.

Actually the accusation involving nuclear weapons was that Saddam was attempting to obtain them, which is a documented fact.

Was it a good enough reason?

Well i can't say it was, the reason i can't say it was a good enough reason is because if it was a good enough reason then we should already be bombing the hell out of Iran, a much bigger threat imo.

Answer 6

no let me rephrase that Was BUSH fair enough dont put this on us innocent citizens