I think the Dems and some Republicans now, want to put terrorism on hold until after the elections. I think when the terrorists read their daily newspaper they are emboldened and consider the Dems an ally against Bush and our troops.
2007-01-24 20:31:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
- %. ANY of the years you cite. i do no longer might desire to renowned which one you %.. - Separate the value selection votes by ability of social gathering to create 2 "what if" budgets: What if purely the GOP votes counted and what if purely Democrat votes counted? - The Democrat budget is at minimum 3-4 circumstances greater advantageous than the GOP budget. there is no longer a single 365 days for which this won't carry authentic. Our NEW deficit is 4 circumstances the previous checklist and the national debt DOUBLED in purely some months with certainly 0 Republican enter. in accordance to Clinton's very final figures, he too left a checklist deficit - the excess have been an estimating blunders. there has been no long term Republican Congress - ever. on your lifetime, they have at maximum had NOMINAL administration and that for purely a pair of decade. Democrats on the different hand had actual filibuster-evidence administration for the period of each and every economic debacle we've EVER experienced as a rustic. Your "fool" made purely a element blunders. costs of activity have been over 20%; unemployment and inflation have been the two in double digits.
2016-11-01 05:43:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And just, pray tell, how do we attack "terrorism"?? NOT by fighting in a country that didn't even harbor terrorists before we got there! We are NOT fighting terrorists in Iraq. In fact, I don't know who we are fighting, because everyone is bombing and shooting everyone else there. Our boys and girls have to be afraid of everyone!
What's "venum"??? Get an education and then ask a serious question about how to get our troops home and leave Iraq in some sort of peace. (Maybe separate states for the separate religious factions, but all under one "federal" government--like the US???) But that would mean we have to TALK to the people over there. Besides, if they now have a "democracy" (the be-all and end-all of GOOD government, eh?), then they must decide for themselves!!! (Isn't that what democracy is all about????)
2007-01-24 20:43:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hehehe
Very astute observation.
America is trying to help the Muslim community (and the world) by providing a safe and free democracy in the midst of their horrible region.
This makes our Country and the world a better place.
We are not over there because of Colonization.
We are not there for their oil.
We are not there to revenge Saddam's threat against an American President.
We know that unless something is done about Islamicfascism and their pledge (and action of already murdering thousands and causing billions of untold damage), to destroy America and Western civilation, we are doomed.
We are there for a noble cause.
President Bush isn't murdering our troops like the liberal biased media and anti-American liberals want people to think.
Islamicfascists are.
Anti-American Islamicfascists hate freedom, America & Western civilization and have pledged their destruction.
Liberals support that.
2007-01-24 23:30:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Feelsgood 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's a two way street.
If all the hate & venom from people here on Y!A both Democrats & Republicans & independents, conservatives & liberals, you and all the other devisive "haters, that is when we would have "the mother of all bombs".
That is what I truly think.
2007-01-24 21:05:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bad M 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
why are they so bitter? most if not all democrats and few repubs seem to believe they are self-righteous. maybe if they started talking to people rather than at them, they would be better understood. and of course most of them can't see past their next election. they are so hellbent on getting the power back in washington, mark my words, if we have a democratic president, senate and house, we will still be waging war on terrorists. right now it is not politically profitable for the dems to support the war on terror, once they get the power back, start their war on terror, they will be hailed as the saviours of the union. and just like most dems, they will get credit for what the repubs did.
its all a game, thats all. dissolve political parties.
2007-01-24 23:18:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by alex l 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
And GEE we didnt have to ship 20,000 Americans somewhere else to do it!
Ever occur to you the reason there are no more terrorist attacks in the US? Its because we're shipping the victims over to the murderers! Free delivery!
2007-01-24 22:56:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can not even guess what is coming down the pyke, can you?
It was not a can of worms that George opened, not a hornest nest he got us into. He awakened all arab penned up animosities and has created literally zillions of terrorists who soon will appear at our MacDonalds. A cosmic mistake of that magnitude can neither be forgiven nor can ever be attacked enough.
2007-01-24 20:29:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think they'd be home by now. I also think it's a stupid question. That's not a personal insult. I think you are a highly intelligent person that happened to ask a less-than highly intelligent question.
2007-01-24 20:24:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by JustaThought 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yup.
2007-01-24 20:24:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋