Why do people criticize President Bush's strategy?

Question

If you're going to criticize his Iraq war strategy, then please let me hear yours. If you don't have one, then keep your mouth shut. And don't say pull out of Iraq, because that would be the biggest and stupidest mistake ever made.
If we pulled out, Iraq would go back to where it was before we wen't it, which was crap, and the 3,000+ Americans that died in Iraq would mean nothing. The Iraqi government can't even control, it's own country, without help.

Not all Presidents are perfect, Presidents are humans, they aren't robots. If you feel what is being done is stupid, then run for office and stop complaining.

Also, people who criticize and insult our troops, you're pathetic. Try walking in their shoes for a day.

Answer 1

You are entitled to your opinion and I agree on some of your issues. Stupid I don't, however I have heard worse. There is no one perfect here but you and I okay ? ha ha No really just kidding?
I believe we cannot pull those troops now and that would be a mistake to show weakness. And I believe we should put our flag there and take it over completely. What we should have done in Germany and Japan a long time ago on the real. Or at least make them pay us back. France too? and Austria, etc., And the Arab countries owe us so much it is not even funny at all? Who do you think built those oil rigs? Who invented the Automobile? They never new anything was in that sand but their kiddy litter? After the wars we went there and helped them all out. Look up Bectel corporation they built those rigs in Saudi and Kuwait and Persia et al? We should have kicked Russian butt and stopped the wall from being put up but they stopped Patton didn't they? And MacCarther wanted to remain in China, but no we pulled him out as well. and then mao tse tung and look at china now? billion people? and starving. We need to send out collectors every where and get our money or get some productivity our of all of this right? After that WTC attack and it was the second time not the first the second time, I think we should have made an ultimatum and said if Pakis or Iraqis or whoevers don't give up the where abouts of all these peoples that are in these terrorists groups, then we will imprison all your people here and we will put you in a world of hurt. Embargo on immediately to all the 21 Arab countries. But get all our embassy people out first and then send troops over there when they tell us where they are and if they don't then starve them out. If the UN did not agree then walk away from the table just like Thomas Jefferson did and mean it , Amen bro

Answer 2

As for the President's strategy, I don't reject it out of hand as additional troops may allow for enough stability for the government there to function and actually focus some its resources on rebuilding the infrastructure in Iraq ( which is key if they want to maintain or gain the support of the people). Simply put, it improved security allows for the government to actually rebuild the country in a way that benefits the lives of everyday Iraqi's, the insurgency will begin to wither way. it's all about who's gonna deliver the goods. However, if more troops are going to be sent, it needs to be done in such a way that will actually deal a blow to the insurgents. A real plan is needed. Lack of a plan is the reason we are in a mess now and the reason why many are sceptical of Bush's plan.

Answer 3

What are you -- his spokesman? Maybe you should be the one to shut up. It's not the general public's job to devise war strategy. However, it is in the general public's interest to criticize their duly-elected government if there is disagreement over policy. That's why we have polls and elections. If Bush can't do a good job of waging a war, then we have a right to tell him to find a better way -- or elect someone else who can do a better job or at least try something else. Are you going to tell me that's not how this country works? I've got a bridge to sell you if you do.

Telling the public to come up with their own idea is irresponsible, senseless, and is, quite simply, stupid. We have a right to expect better from our President: that's why we elected the man in the first place. It's his job -- not the public's, but the president's job -- to find a winning strategy. And if it sucks, people are going to criticize it, so deal with it. That may be too hard for you and others like you to understand, but that's how it's going be.

Answer 4

Ever wonder why the by standers were good in crticising but don't seem to have a better strategy so that everyone comes out as a winner.
If just pack the bags and go home the little school boys can do better than them in office in planet of apes.
Try and come up with something that worth it's weight in gold.
Than the dirty old man will have a hard time in carrying it.

Answer 5

BUSH'S strategy is stuped u know y ? ...... coz he went 2 iraq just 4 controling there oil .. also if he didn't pull out from iraq more than 3000 american soldiers will die .... but who told u that just 3000 american killed there or any where .. they r more than 40000 one ...
i want 2 ad that all presidents r foolish robots controled by stuped strategies ......
about there iraqyan goverment , they came with the invading so they r not going 2 a veirfy any thing 2 iraq .....

Answer 6

First of all fight it like a war...
Overwhelming force sustained until the enemy is eliminated...
maximum troop levels to put down any armed insurrections...
Control the borders and cut off aid to the enemy...
These things must be done first before you can start rebuilding and fixing the city and etc...
these things he is doing or was in the process of doing untill the libs put a wrench in it...

Answer 7

To criticize is easy, but to come up with answers is almost imposible sometimes and too hard for most.