What is the word 'World Peace" means? I means, why do those politician in one hand mention so much about world peace, and yet in the hand can attack another countries despite of the consequences? Why they like to 'mind others's business' in the other countries instead of take very good care of the welfare for the people of their own county? They say they against war and violent, and yet they do the opposite?
Is this world have go insane?
2007-01-24 17:55:42 · 9 answers · asked by dora_chan 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"World Peace" is a phrase filled with deception. The exact opposite are the actions done by those who mouth the phrase, to hide their real intentions. It is very ironic that one has to invade and wage war on one country to "liberate" and bring "peace" to that country.
2007-01-24 19:03:00 · answer #1 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. World Peace is is often claimed to be the inevitable result of some political ideology. Thus, communist thinkers such as Leon Trotsky assumed that the world revolution would lead to a communist world peace, and neoliberal thinkers such as Francis Fukuyama assumed that the rise of liberal democracy will inevitably lead to the "end of history".
The plausibility of world peace tacitly relies on the assumption of rational agents that base their decisions on future consequences, which is not self-evident. Bertrand Russell once expressed his scepticism regarding world peace:
After ages during which the earth produced harmless trilobites and butterflies, evolution progressed to the point at which it has generated Neros, Genghis Khans, and Hitlers. This, however, I believe is a passing nightmare; in time the earth will become again incapable of supporting life, and peace will return.
2. The reason why countries pledge war on other countries is because they are not satisfied with what they have...they wanna play god and solve others problems...why do people believe what a man says...they should believe in GOD...he will put a stop to this if society will only give him a chance.
2007-01-25 02:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by Natz 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Out of all the countries who have gone to war, America's war in Iraq is among the more justifiable wars.
Sometimes in order to keep a war from occurring on a larger scale you must commit yourself to a smaller war that will, as a result, save some lives.
I can't speak for other countries like France, who not too long ago, attacked the Ivory Coast without permission from the United Nations, or detonated Atomic Bombs in French Polynesia with no regard to the fall out on the native inhabitants of that island, or their continued military intervention in former french possessions in Africa who still have economic ties to France. One thing I know for certain is that Saddam Hussein became our business as far back as 1993 when he attempted to kill Bush 41, with seventeen violated UN Security Council Resolutions, his continued negotiations to buy North Korean missiles in Syria, and his harboring of people responsible for the murder of Americans. Abu Musab Al Zarqawi was being sheltered by Saddam Hussein, and allowed to wage his Islamic Jihad against the Kurds. International law actually mandates America and other members of the UN to use military force in order to uphold peace and security.
Sometimes you can only fight fire with fire.
2007-01-25 02:10:46 · answer #3 · answered by billy d 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we are all interrelated what one country does will indirectly affect the others. civilization is so mobile now that humanity cannot afford the costly mistakes and disturbances caused by the few. product markets are dictated by mere speculation. sheer human nature is the reason world peace will no sooner be obtained than a cure for cancer.
it is all a game. most politicians pull at our moral fibers for a vote. world peace will never happen. no one likes war, but its in our nature, and sometimes its neccessary.
2007-01-25 08:46:49 · answer #4 · answered by alex l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there will never be world case bc peace is imposible for anyone ecept for a supernatual being.Most poliction talk about peace bc
its a universal goal though they are talking out of their buts.
Other countries get involved with in other country business bc the have some type of intrest in that country rather it has to do with security ,resourses
etc.You assume that you cant be involved
in other country and take care of their own country.
Its like saying you cant do a good job at work and having enough time for home life.It depends on the resourses being used in eother of the two.
2007-01-25 02:06:50 · answer #5 · answered by the_maskedtoaster 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is the status quo: Say one thing and do another. We have a corporatocracy here. What's good for Halliburton is good for the country.
"Democracy" is for the consumption of the masses so once every four years they get the (erroneous) notion that they are participating!
2007-01-25 03:28:29 · answer #6 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World peace means end all kind of occupation of other people by force.
2007-01-25 02:02:32 · answer #7 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a fantasy, a figment of the imagination.....the world has go insane by the hand.....the hand is the destroyer...yarrrr!
2007-01-25 02:14:04 · answer #8 · answered by no worries 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, the world hasnt gone insane. your utopian, unrealistic ideals merely make it appear that way to you. peace can not make itself. sometimes you have to go fight to achieve it. It's a sad truth, but a truth nontheless.
2007-01-25 02:01:13 · answer #9 · answered by Dashes 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋