English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i cAnT FiNd a rEasOn wHy sOmE cRiTiCs aRe anGrY aT dAn brOwN aNd HiS MASTERPIECE tHe dA viNci cOdE.. wHeN tHe aUthOr oF tHe bOoK HiMseLf aLrEaDy aDmiT tHaT HiS tHe dA viNci cOdE iS siMpLy a FICTION.. i mYseLf aM a cHriStiAn aNd i FeAr gOd.. bUt i tHiNk tHe nOveL iS nOt a rEasOn tO dEstrOy mY FaitH.. trUtH iS tHaT i rEaLLy LikE tHe nOveL aNd tHe mOviE aNd i wAs aMazEd bY tHe LiMiTLeSs iMaGinAtiOn oF dAn brOwN.. aNd iTs nOt trUe tHaT tHe mOviE iS DEAD aS tO wHaT cArL oLsOn sAid.. sO wHy aRe sOmE cRiTiCs aNgRy? i dOn'T knOw mAybE iTz jEaLoUsY tO dAn brOwN tHat mAdE tHeM mAd prOoF tO wHaT tHey hAd wRittEn iN tHeiR bOoKs aNd bLoGs oR tHeiR jUz jEaLoUs bcOz tHeiR bOoKs dOn'T seLL..

2007-01-24 17:38:21 · 6 answers · asked by trUtH 1 in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

6 answers

Look: short and sweet--Dan Brown's a bit of a hack. Don't get me wrong, it's fine pulp, but his is not literature nor is it accurate in the o-so-many-ways he claims it is.

I wouldn't have a problem with him at all if he didn't foist his shoddy theology and his biased research and conspiracy-mongering as truth.

He should've said, Hey! I wrote a rocking good story instead of trying to build this rat-trap mythology and pawn it off as something resembling academic merit.

2007-01-24 19:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by SnowFlats 3 · 0 0

First Dan Brown at the beginning when interviewed on NBC said that everything he wrote in that defilement was fact And he had proof. He then in the second interview stated that the book was just fiction.
Fiction is one thing a Book of Lies is another. As if the code wasn't bad enough he has now written a book "The Gospel of Dan Brown" where he explains which of the Holy scriptures is false.
I would NOT want to be Dan Brown on Judgment Day but I do want front row seats when he meets his maker and finds out how he will spend eternity.
Our Lord wasn't married to anyone. The Bible states he is the Bridegroom but we the Church are his Bride. The only one he has ever or ever will have.

2007-01-24 22:30:42 · answer #2 · answered by Bashful Reader 3 · 1 0

I don't think it is the critics who are angry- it is some conservative Christians who don't like the reference to Mary being the wife of Jesus, as it goes counter to their beleifs.

and DaVinci Code was no masterpiece.

and PLEASE don't write like that if you want anyone to read your question.

2007-01-24 17:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by slaughter114 4 · 0 0

You are NOT cool. You are a retard. Type like a normal person, and maybe you'll get a constructive answer. Type like some kind of mental deficient, and you get what you deserve. Jerkoff.

2007-01-24 17:44:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

they are angry because they are critics.
if they were not critics they wouldnt have been angry.
simple!

tYpE nOrMalLy

2007-01-24 19:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by Felis 3 · 0 0

Like I'm gonna read that!

2007-01-24 17:46:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers