>>>> Why don't people wake up and see the danger in Iraq.... when we leave? Take the following for example<<<
"Iraq has never had peace and never will."
"We won't never win, screw Iraq and bring our troops home."
"I support the war on terror, but not the Iraq war"
*notice the irony of the above statement*
"Who started this war anyway? It was Bush and his evil plan to take over all the oil to fuel his conquest of the middle east. He started 9/11... so he lied to everyone and made us go to war."
*Note the stupidity of the above statement*
>>>> You see, Congress and most Democrats voted for the war before it became unpopular. Al Queda is in Iraq. We drove them out of Afganistan and they went into Iraq. That is the main front of the war on terror. If we leave Iraq too soon, it will become a terrorist haven.
Of course we could just forget all those pesky facts and blame bush for everything.
Everyone knows that complaining is the best way to solve problems.
2007-01-24 17:23:39 · 7 answers · asked by Mr. Agappae 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yea, I don't see where you exaggerated their opinions any. People need to wake up. Thank you.
2007-01-24 17:38:49 · answer #1 · answered by asmith1022_2006 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that Bush is not working on devising regional and international support for the Iraqi government. That's the reason why their government is weak.
Its hard to tell what he really wants out of all the violence in Iraq. The troop boost won't help calm down the insurgency, and many Iraqis actually support them.
I am beginning to think that Bush is seriously preparing a war against Iran. From what I have seen so far, his plans would fail just like before. The nightmare would become worse.
2007-01-25 01:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You do realize that AL Qaeda wasn't in Iraq until after we got there don't you?
I support the war on terror but not the Iraq War. Even though Saddam did give money to the families of suicide bombers, it wasn't as much as our supposed allies, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or Pakistan. Saddam was very much against Al Qaeda because they wanted to remove him from power. Bush played into Osama's hands by removing Saddam from power. Not only does AQ now have a foothold in Iraq, they use it to train their operatives. They're getting the experience they need and are using it to train others. The newest wave of road side bombs in Afghanistan are almost identical to those used in Iraq. The Iraq invasion has only fueled the fires caused by AQ.
2007-01-25 01:34:59 · answer #3 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nobody really says they do not want to put more troops in Iraq. But, Goddammit put enough there to make a difference and stop "playing pattycake" with them. I cannot believe people can be so damn stupid and gullible. Open a book and read about "false flag operations" and right now as we keep our silence, he keeps this damn charade going while clsing in on us with the strongest fist of military rule since Hitler. Hell, he probably would have been best of friends with him. Now he diverts attention again with the Damn road from texas to canada. It does not take a genious to see what he is doing. Just research it people, for Gods sake!
2007-01-25 02:33:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
can you actually learn something about terror before you start talking about what other people know?
WE CLEARLY DROVE THEM INTO PAKISTAN... WHERE THEY PRETTY MUCH CLEARLY STILL ARE...
a few are in Iraq... but it seems to be a very few, probably among the least in any middle eastern nation... government estimates say about 1,300 total foreign fighters total... that's nothing relatively... and even fewer are al-queda...
watch the news once in a while and leave the politics to the adults...
do you really think 1,300 people could take over a nation of millions? apparently... thus the gullibility of conservatives... that's the fact that you seem to be completely ignoring...
al-queda is clearly in every middle eastern nation... and probably most European nations and most likely in America...
these aren't secrets... they are pretty much accepted facts... unlike what you were saying...
2007-01-25 02:02:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's the way a lot of people seem to view things & it's not an exageration. I agree with you completely.
2007-01-25 01:37:43 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Democats realized thier mistake, and have called for changes.
Bush has no realization= Stupidity!
2007-01-25 01:30:44 · answer #7 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋