Do you ever say things to people with the intention of hurting them?

Question

Like if you had a bad day, or you're just feeling inadequate? Or maybe they just annoy you?

You shouldn't do that; it's mean. :-(

I mean, to people you love and/or care about... Not some random G's. ;-)

Answer 1

I do my best to follow the Golden Rule. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It's hard to do sometimes when people treat you like crap and you wanna give it right back to them. But I do my best to overlook stupidity in people I don't know well and don't lower myself to their level. I'm better than that. And I forgive my bf, family, and friends when they mess up and hurt my feelings sometimes. And I don't do it back to them. What goes around always comes back around ...good or bad..sooner or later you always get it back.

Answer 2

that would desire to no longer be the point, yet with companies like the WWE, it type of feels that way. The WWE is a business enterprise that prides themselves because of the fact the utmost of each and every thing, the only advertising that exists till the business enterprise is an element of their video library. So at this component, it type of looks like Vince McMahon will purely have the point of wounding the different business enterprise attempting to handle him because of the fact Vince McMahon is approximately entire domination. regrettably, TNA has comparable intentions and this is been glaring for years. a collection of human beings in TNA are disgruntled people who oftentimes bash WWE for his or her product, and that consists of a number of the individuals who have been actual efficient there. TNA isn't from now on powerful than WWE in terms of intentions with the recommendations of a looming "scores conflict", and for my area i'm ill and fed up in the assumption of a "scores conflict" between the two that every person keeps stating. to your question, the respond isn't any, exceedingly interior the expert Wrestling corporation we see right this moment. opposition is undesirable, and with the two companies, "competing" with one yet another straight away for visitors won't "make their products greater powerful in any respect". first of all, maximum WWE followers do no longer watch TNA as is, so how lots of an impact will scores have if WWE and TNA followers pass backward and forward between shows, or maybe elect one. 2d, maximum TNA followers fairly watch something WWE, exceedingly uncooked. so the place's this "conflict" coming from? an concept of a "scores conflict" additionally won't many something greater powerful because of the fact the products will grow to be dramatically worse. check out the latest version of TNA impact that got here approximately. THAT type of teach is strictly what human beings could get from the two WWE and TNA in the event that they competed with one yet another: one solid tournament to fulfill the IWC, a collection of gimmick crap that they desire can "marvel" non-common visitors into observing, and a ridiculous volume of promos and skits to objective and "entertain". That became genuinely the perspective era in a nutshell, and the two WWF and WCW did that type of teach. Is that the type of teach human beings actual want? particularly? that's what "opposition" will do?

Answer 3

Yupp ur right, people should'nt, i just ave a smoke, all the stress goes away.

Answer 4

um yea? like how i told off them Gs not to mess wit my girl! :0

Answer 5

only if they throw the first stone,i'm not a starter i'm the closer

Answer 6

no sometimes ppl just blurt out stuff they dont mean

Answer 7

Yes of course! We all do that. And no sometimes THEY DESERVE it.