There has been a big myth about why kids from Asian background is good at maths and the Caucasian kids aren't as good. Many people blame it on coaching industry and that parents force kids to work harder, ... But no one seems to care about the English problems of migrant kids.
The Asian kids are only good at maths because they have to work harder in maths to make up for their English disadvantages. In English speaking countries like the US, Canada and Australia, migrant kids always trail local kids in English due to the lack of a good English speaking home environment.
However I feel that Asian kids are still not quite matching white kids on the top level of abstract maths. That's why we still see that most top mathematicians at Universities are still Caucasians. or perhaps this is only because Asian kids are more interested in making money (there is not much money in being a mathematician)
Any ideas?
2007-01-24
16:52:10
·
6 answers
·
asked by
dmaivn
3
in
Education & Reference
➔ Primary & Secondary Education
To explain my view, I am Asian too. I am not saying anything about race issue but about approaches. It's obvious that migrant kids trail local kids (regardless of races) in the first few years in English. My child is still trying to get to the top in English. I mean trailing the top local kids, not the average! This is due to the superior English speaking environment of middle class local kids.
Maths coaching (and other subjects) is big among migrant groups especially Asian. But the risk is clear. The coaching is not very wholesome, often overuse the memory faculty and underuse the logic and deep thinking abilities of the brain. Asian kids often become burnt out after entry into Universities.
Often Asian kids lead Caucasian kids 1-3 years in maths, but the gap does close by end of highschool where top white kids are just as competitive (don't talk about the average one!)
2007-01-28
13:16:01 ·
update #1